It's been raining non-stop for a week (deluge) so I have been killing time experimenting with forming 20VTG cases from .223/5.56 Once-Fired/Range Brass using Ramos' case forming method.
1) Redding 221 Fireball Form Die #1
2) Redding 221 Fireball Form & Trim Die #83101
3) Redding 20 Vartarg Type S FL Sizing Die (internal components removed)
4) Redding 20 Vartarg Type S FL Sizing Die (two .228 bushings stacked inside)
Based on the markings/surface irregularities, most of the .223/5.56 Donor Brass was fired through an AR15. I carefully selected cases in good condition, but even with the front-end QC I still experienced a 30% rejection rate. Before moving on to the neck turning phase, I culled any newly-formed case that displayed a "potential" issue (deep nicks, creases, fissures, etc.) located in neck or shoulder area. Some of these issues may have ironed out after fire-forming, but others would have definitely remained. I was surprised by the pattern of the irregularities/defects in the newly-formed 20VTG cases, which made me curious and peaked my OCD.
I had two question that nagged me:
1) What was the cause of the defect on the newly-formed 20VTG cases?
2) How far did a defect located on the donor .223/5.56 brass migrate during case forming process... Where did it ultimately come to rest on the newly formed 20VTG case?
This turned into a light study/experiment to determine how the various defects/irregularities on the Once-Fired .223/5.56 Donor Brass transferred over to the newly-formed 20VTG cases. I hand-selected a sampling (50 cases) of Once-Fired Range Brass with different types of irregularities/defects as well as the location of the defects on the cases. I even did a side-by-side comparison using Imperial Sizing Wax and Hornady OneShot.
I thought I would share my results/observations.... enjoy. Its a bit of a deep dive.
1) Redding 221 Fireball Form Die #1
2) Redding 221 Fireball Form & Trim Die #83101
3) Redding 20 Vartarg Type S FL Sizing Die (internal components removed)
4) Redding 20 Vartarg Type S FL Sizing Die (two .228 bushings stacked inside)
Based on the markings/surface irregularities, most of the .223/5.56 Donor Brass was fired through an AR15. I carefully selected cases in good condition, but even with the front-end QC I still experienced a 30% rejection rate. Before moving on to the neck turning phase, I culled any newly-formed case that displayed a "potential" issue (deep nicks, creases, fissures, etc.) located in neck or shoulder area. Some of these issues may have ironed out after fire-forming, but others would have definitely remained. I was surprised by the pattern of the irregularities/defects in the newly-formed 20VTG cases, which made me curious and peaked my OCD.
I had two question that nagged me:
1) What was the cause of the defect on the newly-formed 20VTG cases?
2) How far did a defect located on the donor .223/5.56 brass migrate during case forming process... Where did it ultimately come to rest on the newly formed 20VTG case?
This turned into a light study/experiment to determine how the various defects/irregularities on the Once-Fired .223/5.56 Donor Brass transferred over to the newly-formed 20VTG cases. I hand-selected a sampling (50 cases) of Once-Fired Range Brass with different types of irregularities/defects as well as the location of the defects on the cases. I even did a side-by-side comparison using Imperial Sizing Wax and Hornady OneShot.
I thought I would share my results/observations.... enjoy. Its a bit of a deep dive.
Last edited: