I've done that with my RFBR rifles, but never with a CF, yet anyways.Ha! Funny you should mention that. I was doing some load development one day and a fly landed on the target and I couldn't resist.
I've done that with my RFBR rifles, but never with a CF, yet anyways.Ha! Funny you should mention that. I was doing some load development one day and a fly landed on the target and I couldn't resist.
How involved is the case conversion process???If you want 20P velocity (which is just about 204 Ruger velocity) why not go with a 20 Bobcat? I like the longer case neck. I fireformed 1100 at the start of my annual prairie dog hunt a few years ago. Dogs at 350 to 375 yards were dropping like flies.
View attachment 1417709
That's often true, but Imma tell ya that I went with the 20-222 because I like things on the mild side for my varmint shooting. Heck, that's why I had a 222 instead of a 22-250. I'd have probably thought more about a Vartarg, except I've got a 218 Bee that kind of fills that slot.Folks recommend what they have. Business as usual.
Folks recommending something they don’t have would seem to offer questionable input if they have no experience with it…or am I missing something? On the other hand, folks giving first hand information on chamberings they do have has probably caused more than myself to end up owning it too. I have no regrets having fallen prey to this. I think they call that ‘purchase mentoring’. I’m a willing victim and have been known to be on the persuading side too .Folks recommend what they have. Business as usual.
Size the necks down to 20 cal, load and shoot. I have a 20 Bobcat die set and I use that die, but just like 20P, you can use a 222 bushing die to do the same.How involved is the case conversion process???
Well I've got a few regrets about the time I got suckered by a guys wonderful description about the rare and innovative .491 Burgness Stratness.Folks recommending something they don’t have would seem to offer questionable input if they have no experience with it…or am I missing something? On the other hand, folks giving first hand information on chamberings they do have has probably caused more than myself to end up owning it too. I have no regrets having fallen prey to this. I think they call that ‘purchase mentoring’. I’m a willing victim and have been known to be on the persuading side too .
That's often true, but Imma tell ya that I went with the 20-222 because I like things on the mild side for my varmint shooting. Heck, that's why I had a 222 instead of a 22-250. I'd have probably thought more about a Vartarg, except I've got a 218 Bee that kind of fills that slot.
There is plenty of room to go hotter with the prac, or the tac, Ruger, or the crazy hot ones. but I'm wondering just how much more efficient they are at that "beyond 300" thing. Our little 32 grain bullets have such a wimpy BC that real long range is pretty hard on performance. I've never chronied my loads but I'm assuming they're leaving the rifle at around 3500 fps. And I'm gonna tell you that at 300 yards they're starting to drop like a rock. I do a lot of missing out at that range. From zero to two hundred, I hardly miss a squirrel. jd
Ok fine. In the meantime count the number of “I”Folks recommending something they don’t have would seem to offer questionable input if they have no experience with it…or am I missing something? On the other hand, folks giving first hand information on chamberings they do have has probably caused more than myself to end up owning it too. I have no regrets having fallen prey to this. I think they call that ‘purchase mentoring’. I’m a willing victim and have been known to be on the persuading side too .
I think your point is valid and fair. Maybe it would be fair to say we both see the same trends but just in different lenses. In my case, I don’t have a 20 Practical to compare to the 20-222. But I do have a 20 Tactical as well as 4 other 20 caliber chamberings. None of them except the Vartarg were mentioned in my posts and per the OP question being 20-222 or 20 Practical, most would agree the 20 Practical and 20 Tactical are ballistic twins. So I felt confidence in my opinion on the “either-or” question posted with my preference to the 20-222. I will admit fault for giving the Vartarg undeserved attention in this case as it wasn’t part of the OP’s choices. I could have kept it out of my post.Ok fine. In the meantime count the number of “I”
My point is that every time someone asks a technical question it seems to turn into an open invitation for people to talk about their own stuff. Think this statement is an exaggeration? Read through similar posts.
I hope you guys can make up my mind. I've been trying to decide between those two myself. I am leaning towards a 20-222.
The bobcat came from Kevin Weaver I believe. Years ago I almost reached to him and just never did, neat lil round.If you want 20P velocity (which is just about 204 Ruger velocity) why not go with a 20 Bobcat? I like the longer case neck. I fireformed 1100 at the start of my annual prairie dog hunt a few years ago. Dogs at 350 to 375 yards were dropping like flies.
View attachment 1417709
IMO if you have either a 223 or 222, then go with the 20 caliber version of whichever you have. It’s hard not to favor the 223 or 20 Practical because of the wide availability of brass, and reloading components. I’m a 222 guy so went with that because I have components and dies, etc. For the most part, you’ll be shooting 32, 39/40gr bullets, so either has the capacity to push those plenty fast. Another rationale, modern 20 Practical, nostalgic 20-222.I hope you guys can make up my mind. I've been trying to decide between those two myself. I am leaning towards a 20-222.