as RS considers it a single base powder.
It's not. There's a bit of sleight of hand (or word) here. All high-energy powders are single-base (to start with), but have NG added to increase the energy content. Read Nitrochemie's words carefully.
True (being pedantic here) double-based propellants are those which have nitroglycerine in the basic mix from the early manufacturing stages. These are mostly ball powders so far as rifle powders go. It's this fact that Nitrochemie plays upon to avoid the dreaded 'double-based' tag.
RS52 is an extruded, single-based propellant powder based on nitrocellulose. A unique impregnation method using nitroglycerine assures top performance.
In this day and age, SB v DB is much less important than it once was anyway and many ball powders give extended barrel lives - that's one of several reasons why many governments including the US specify them for military smallarms ammo - and they are often far less temperature affected than was the case not so many years back.
So, RS24, 40, 52, 60, 70, and 80 contain N-G on top of the basic N-C. The fact that they start as straight single base N-C powders is immaterial. They are in this respect identical to Viht N500 series powders - in fact Nitrochemie sold or licensed the N-G infusion process to Vihtavuori Oy, although the UK RS importer tells me that Nitrochemie has continued to develop it, and its process is now far superior to the older Viht method. (He would say that of course!)
RS52 has a nominal specific energy rating of 3,990 KJ per Kg compared to Viht N550's 4,050 KJ/Kg and N540's 4,100 values, so it's 'cooler'. In fact, it runs at similar energy inputs to Swedish Bofors manufactured Reloder powders. Hodgdon / ADI 308 powders are actually 'hotter' despite being true-single base - 4,050/4,060 for VarGet / H4895. That's one reason for how this pair of Hodgdon powders produce such high MVs in the cartridge.
The way to look at it is a mixture of inputs and outputs. If you use hot burning powders at absolute top pressures and velocities, you get a lower barrel count life. As simple as that, there are NO technical fixes that give anybody a free lunch. Nitrochemie's IE infusion method is a fantastic 'trick' to increase MVs - but it does so by allowing the early charge burn at or near top-end pressures and temperatures to last longer, ie it flattens or extends the peak pressure spike at the beginning of the chamber pressure v time trace. That allows much higher MVs to be attained, but at the expense of the back end of the barrel being subjected to a longer period of heat and pressure torture.
If the case has enough capacity to give suitable MVs using larger charges of very cool burning powders, you enhance the barrel life for that particular cartridge design. A good example is 284 Win / Shehane where you can get 2,825 to 2,850 with a 180 using a case-full of Viht N165 a propellant with only 3,500 KJ/Kg specific energy. That'll only be slightly behind sensible MVs and pressures from H4831sc but should add significantly to barrel life. (Most people still use 'shortcut' assuming they can get hold of it as it seems to suit the 284 to a T.)