Flouncer said:http://www.jbmballistics.com/cgi-bin/jbmbcv-5.1.cgi
As they said, start with a 100-yard zero. Your NF has how many MOA elevation total ? 40 MOA according to their web page. Subtract the MOA or "clicks/8" that you used to get from a bottomed out elevation zero to 100 yads. This is your remaining MOA. Note this number for future use.Punch in your 105 Berger from the bullet list at 2950 for 1000 yards and note the drop MOA in results column 3. Using Litz and the 105 VLD with no other scope correction I get 29 MOA. Unless you used more than 10 MOA to get to 100 yards, you'll have plenty. You don't even need the 20 MOA rail. That's simplified but it has always worked for me.
Or, you can set the zero for 100 yards and the target range at 1,000 yards. calculate and read the drop MOA at the bottom of column 3.
Unless you used more than 10 MOA to get to 100 yards, you'll have plenty - Edit: from a bottomed out negative scope elevation setting
Flouncer said:In his (PM's) post, an given is assumed that the 40 MOA is split 20/20 up down from a 100-yard zero. That was not the case in my setup. I have only used this one scope, other than scout type mounts using pistol scopes for under 200 yards..... I am a total fledgling here. Anyone ???
Interesting, then. Is my receiver angled or why else the huge disparity between my inexpensive 1990's 6x24 Taiwan scope and the Long range Precision Night Force ? My zero neutral at 100 yards uses only 7.25 MOA of the 45 MOA, not 22.5..
pmarauder said:Is my receiver angled or why else the huge disparity between my inexpensive 1990's 6x24 Taiwan scope and the Long range Precision Night Force ? My zero neutral at 100 yards uses only 7.25 MOA of the 45 MOA, not 22.5..