wildcatter
Silver $$ Contributor
There is absolutely no difference in the two, most will chamber either cartridge. Personally, the 17 Mach IV will always be the classier of the two! The Fireball simply screams,, me to, me to, Mike Walker would have never approved of adding the 17 Fireball, all it di was make it more convenient to get brass for an already established cartridge. I would rather use 221 Fireball Brass, just leave it knowing you have the most efficient 17 caliber around, and great taste in classic cartridges!
My 10 twist shoots in the high ones and low twos when I do my part, I use N-133 and the Hornady 20 grain Vmax running north of 4150 fps. Only load I ever shot was 18.5, 18.7, and 19.0. the 19.0 shot so good I went home and loaded everything I had. I have 50 rounds of 17 fireball brass from Nosler. But prefer the 221 Lapua brass. Both are simply run thru my die, and good to go. BUT, my chamber is a tight neck, so no matter what brass I use, I have to NK turn. But there isn't 20 fps difference or .1" of accuracy difference in either.
It's a 17, so any load development needs to be done starting low, and .2 of a grain can be good to go or instantly to hot. So baby steps is the focus with any 17 caliber round. You'll love that little rig, I do.
My 10 twist shoots in the high ones and low twos when I do my part, I use N-133 and the Hornady 20 grain Vmax running north of 4150 fps. Only load I ever shot was 18.5, 18.7, and 19.0. the 19.0 shot so good I went home and loaded everything I had. I have 50 rounds of 17 fireball brass from Nosler. But prefer the 221 Lapua brass. Both are simply run thru my die, and good to go. BUT, my chamber is a tight neck, so no matter what brass I use, I have to NK turn. But there isn't 20 fps difference or .1" of accuracy difference in either.
It's a 17, so any load development needs to be done starting low, and .2 of a grain can be good to go or instantly to hot. So baby steps is the focus with any 17 caliber round. You'll love that little rig, I do.
Last edited: