jelenko
Gold $$ Contributor
!!You have to be very analytical about everything you do and constantly work to find things to correct.
!!You have to be very analytical about everything you do and constantly work to find things to correct.
No, I leave them where I like themThis is just an off the wall question about things one can do to eliminate variables while determining accuracy during load development. While watching some Winning in the Wind YouTube videos last night as well as a few others, something popped into my head.
Do any of you experienced reloaders that shoot a lot, but mainly for fun or hunting, turn down the trigger weight while testing loads to maybe rule out one more variable, and then turn them back for normal use? The competition shooters probably already have ounce weight triggers or pulls less than 2 pounds but I'm not on that level or anywhere close. I shoot hunting rifles and all of my firearms but one register 3- 3 1/2 pounds of pull and it is just a taint under 3 but it can go down to 1 1/2 if I want.
While watching Winning In The Wind and seeing some of his groups in the .15-.3" range I got to wondering just how little of a trigger pull he has shooting those tiny tiny groups from his heavy custom guns on a high tech front rest.
I'm just a freshman loader with 40 years of country boy shooting experience with off the shelve rifles. As I've aged, I like to think the quality of my gun purchases has improved, but in the end they are all production rifles, not custom builds.
My gut tells me to leave them like they are because I'm used to them, but curiosity says what if it improves group size significantly. I haven't read about or seen the first person mention it, but I also know that trigger pull and grouping is a real thing.
What is y'all's opinions?
Ironic you said that. I posted a question recently on rokslide asking a question about being ANALytical (lol).You have to be very analytical about everything you do and constantly work to find things to correct.
I have not ever considered turning them down until the other night when I started wondering if anyone actually does it. I don't have any desire to start manipulating any of my triggers just for load development, but I do like the idea that Boyd Allen posted about having an interchangeable trigger to drop in just for load development. If I were to ever seriously contemplate the practice of a light trigger for that purpose, his method might be the approach I would consider.If you are turning down your trigger to test groups
That is a viable method
However, if you are turning it right back up for field use,? how are you ensuring you will shoot the same size groups or provide the same level of shot placement out in the field?
I didn't read his method but it does make sense to ensure the load itself is optimized.I have not ever considered turning them down until the other night when I started wondering if anyone actually does it. I don't have any desire to start manipulating any of my triggers just for load development, but I do like the idea that Boyd Allen posted about having an interchangeable trigger to drop in just for load development. If I were to ever seriously contemplate the practice of a light trigger for that purpose, his method might be the approach I would consider.
Another technique is to fit a Trigger Shoe.I have not ever considered turning them down until the other night when I started wondering if anyone actually does it. I don't have any desire to start manipulating any of my triggers just for load development, but I do like the idea that Boyd Allen posted about having an interchangeable trigger to drop in just for load development. If I were to ever seriously contemplate the practice of a light trigger for that purpose, his method might be the approach I would consider.
Excellent point you made here!!!I do dry fire before going hot when I switch rifles.