• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

2024 Olympics 50m Rifle: Cant!

Brians356

Gold $$ Contributor
I was surprised to notice some shooters in Paris with a lot of cant evident in their hold. Of course cant does not affect score if you are consistent shot-to-shot. This photo is from the 2020 2016 Summer Olympics, but is representative of what I am watching on TV as I write this.
-
1722562962851.png
-
 
Last edited:
I was surprised to notice some shooters in Paris with a lot of cant evident in their hold. Of course cant does not affect score if you are consistent shot-to-shot. This photo is from the 2020 Summer Olympics, but is representative of what I am watching on TV as I write this.
-
View attachment 1577495
-
I think it's all about finding your "natural point of aim" and being comfortable in the process. Or, I am completely off in the weeds somewhere. Lol.
Paul
 
If you are shooting at only one distance and not adjusting for wind or elevation, it w(sh)ould not matter.
Agree 100%, as long as the cant hold is very consistent. But the effect of cant is not linear, so as cant increases, the consistency becomes more critical and difficult to achieve.
-
 
50 meter smallbore is shot outdoors. Most shooters, if not all at this level, use rear sights that can rotate to get the sight back to level and compensate for the cant.

Major congratulations to Sagen Maddalena for bringing home a Silver medal in women's 3P smallbore for the U.S. today!!! She is as tough a competitor as there is and truly earned this. She had a solid performance in women's air rifle also, finishing 4th overall.
 
50 meter smallbore is shot outdoors. Most shooters, if not all at this level, use rear sights that can rotate to get the sight back to level and compensate for the cant.
You're right, it was outdoors! There was no sun out, so it appeared on TV to be indoors. Thanks for the clarification.

I don't see how rotating the rear sight to level compensates for the front sight not being directly above
(plumb to) the muzzle, but if you have a link to an explanation, I'm eager to be educated.

1722611818631.png
-
 
Last edited:
My question about the front sight still stands. If both front and rear sights could be rotated into a plane containing the bore line, cant would be eliminated.
-
 
If you canted the rifle 90 degrees clockwise and had to move your POI to the left 2 scoring rings, would you get there by turning the windage knob? No. If you rotated the rear sight counterclockwise 90 degrees and turned the windage knob you will.
 
If you canted the rifle 90 degrees clockwise and had to move your POI to the left 2 scoring rings, would you get there by turning the windage knob? No. If you rotated the rear sight counterclockwise 90 degrees and turned the windage knob you will.
Cant also affects vertical, and 90 degrees of cant affects vertical drastically. What is the "sight height above bore" value if (in your example) the front sight's height above bore is now zero?
-
 
There’s 2 knobs on the sights. 1 for vertical, 1 for horizontal. Each shooter knows how they work and when to turn them. That’s what’s most important. You are either trying to make this way harder than it is or you’re trolling me for some reason. I have nothing further to add.
 
Super consistent and repeatable hold day in/day out, zero for one range, hold wind on the target, or dial a level corrected rear sight.
We like to lean way over the cheek piece with no cant. Shooter in picture seems to be straight up with stock hard into cheek. Now, who in the world would want a rifle zeroed for just ONE RANGE?

Looks to be about 10 degrees.
Consistency is the key.
Hold the same, zero for range, why wouldn't 10 shots go into the same POI?
We like to think our scope is above bore, but plumb reticle is the trick.

Across the course, different ranges would be a bit more complicated.
Is this any different than offset sights?
 

Attachments

  • cant.JPG
    cant.JPG
    77.6 KB · Views: 19
Last edited:
Hold the same, zero for range, why wouldn't 10 shots go into the same POI?
As I stated early on, consistent canted hold is not a problem. But my point now is that simply making the rear sight plumb to the bore, but neglecting the front sight's cant, is not eliminating cant. It's only making it easier for the shooter to be consistent. The range being fixed allows the crutch to be practical.
-
 
Neither sight is plumb to bore.
Plumb to each other, reticle plumb to gravity.
Just think how much better these Olympic shooters could shoot without cant.

Even Hold-For-Wind on the target would get you left/right correction for wind.
High Power shooters could probably Zero canted sights for a single range, and hold on target for wind.
Hit right, move left :)
 
Last edited:
I was surprised to notice some shooters in Paris with a lot of cant evident in their hold.
It shouldn't be a surprise. Canting a rifle with sights off vertical have been used in competition forever. Are the multi position shooters supposed to rotate sights for every position? I think they choose to leave them as is and figure out (as mentioned above) how to turn the elevation and windage dials to get where they need to be. I'm pretty sure they know their zeros for each position. Tubb has a whole section in his book "the Rifle Shooter" that goes through how why he does it the way he does.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,871
Messages
2,205,022
Members
79,174
Latest member
kit10n
Back
Top