• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Brass

After. Whether you ae turning just to clean up the thickness or turning for a tight neck chamber the weight will change accordingly.
 
Out of the box and onto the scale simply tells you how good the brass disk were made. Your gonna shoot the finished product case, which does not include the removed brass. Say two new out of box cases weight the exact same thing. One has a thick neck, other a thin neck. So you will be making necks equal, by removing different amounts of brass, making the case weights different.

Frank
 
If you trying to sort brass by weight it may not necessarily correlate to internal case capacity
But a lot of shooters do it because it's quick and easy, I'd sort by internal case capacity to eliminate the high/low outlayers but that's another rabbit hole.
 
Out of the box and onto the scale simply tells you how good the brass disk were made. Your gonna shoot the finished product case, which does not include the removed brass. Say two new out of box cases weight the exact same thing. One has a thick neck, other a thin neck. So you will be making necks equal, by removing different amounts of brass, making the case weights different.

Frank
Some of the top shooters don't weigh or determine volume wth Lapua brass. You don't know if the case weight variation is in the case head or body.
 
Worked several years in the 7.62 case area at lake city. Never could figure out weighing brass cases. So many factors not influenced by the weight of the case. I guess it might catch a few things really out of whack but their inspection oughta catch that stuff. Doug
 
If ya look at a case cut-out diagram or even the real thing, you can see that probably 1/2 of the case weight is contained in about the bottom third of the case. And about half of that portion is hardly effected by the sizing process.

I'm starting to think that the only logical way of comparing cases is to do it by water volume, and then only after being fired in my chamber and then trimmed to equal length and primer pockets conditioned.

AND -- I would only do that if I was a REAL shooter like some of y'all. And no, I'm not trying to be sarcastic. jd
 
300 pcs Lapua 6BR brass weight sorted for my 30BR. I culled 30 pcs. = 10%. I always waste a few setting my neck turner. After these were neck turned, fire formed twice and trimmed to length I weighed about 30 pcs and all were <0.5 gr. Most varied .1-.2 grains.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2466.jpg
    IMG_2466.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 10
300 pcs Lapua 6BR brass weight sorted for my 30BR. I culled 30 pcs. = 10%. I always waste a few setting my neck turner. After these were neck turned, fire formed twice and trimmed to length I weighed about 30 pcs and all were <0.5 gr. Most varied .1-.2 grains.
Would also be interesting to see if the cases which had equal weight after processing, also had equal H2O weight. jd
 
A lot of great shooters don’t cull any brass. I culled my 10% and never touched them again except for using a few to set my neck trimmer. My method gives me confidence and piece of mind for short range Benchrest. If I shot long range I’d probably think about checking case capacity.

Okay I stand corrected. Your processed cases turned out more uniform in weight, than I would have expected.

The, "After these were sorted . . . " statement is a little confusing. I could be having a "numb spell" [as we like to say up here in Maine :)], but did you did process and include the 30 culls, minus any that got roached, with the other 70?

The test to see if the original difference(s) in weight mattered, would be to keep the three batches separated, run them thru the same process, and then using your best load, test fire them against each other.

Just a suggestion.

SJ
 
Would also be interesting to see if the cases which had equal weight after processing, also had equal H2O weight. jd
A while back someone posted extensive data where they plotted case weight VS case volume. It was a scatter chart. Someone else posted data that seemed to show correlation??? If you are not shooting serious competition don't worry about it. Just go by the load that makes the smallest group and have fun shooting or hunting. Do a search and you can find the data and graphs.

Charts on wt. VS volume on this website. Do a search for scatter chart to find the original complete article.
Looks to me like it's not meaningful.

1712711013560.png

1712710820838.png
1712710850268.png
 
Last edited:

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,267
Messages
2,215,513
Members
79,508
Latest member
Jsm4425
Back
Top