Not so much. The .22 Creedmoor just has the twist to stabilize heavy for caliber bullets, where the other comparable cartridges do not. With the exception of the 6.5 Creedmoor, Which I see as poorly represented by the data.
The Swift and the .22-250 have always had the drawback of loose twists. They stabilize light bullets at hyper-velocity. But, those, obviously, don't carry very far. Not nearly as far as a high BC, skinny caliber 224". That means long and heavy for .224.
Added: The loose twists seems to be an American thing, because God forbid we ever follow what the Swede's did in 1894, which is to twist a barrel in 1-8.44" (215mm) ,Or Germans with their 1-9.4" (240mm) We've always been set on the loosest twist possible, because that could make the best group @ 100 yds. Nevermind it won't keep the bullet stable out to 1k or beyond. Two different types of accuracy. This is what's driving the "fairy-dust/anti-Creedmoor" people. They won't accept that for far too long we have not twisted our rifle barrels here in America tight enough to stabilize heavy for caliber bullets that maximize a firearm capability. By coming out with new tight twisted cartridges, we can now just go to the store shelf if we want to do some long range shooting. Whereas before, we had to change our barrel and do the handloading.