if you like bushing diesMy understanding is that the % of the neck that is sized (whether 50%, 70% or 100%) could have and effect on neck tension. So not all of the bearing surface in the neck may be making contact with the sized portion of the neck.
And there is no way to directly measure neck tension, which I believe would require some way of measuring the inward neck hoop tension with some sort of sensor; I am not aware of any commercially available options to do this.
Look at a few of the famous accuracy cartridges and the generally have long necks.I guess my question is whether to have less freebore and seat the bullet deeper in the neck or more freebore and seat it further out in the neck. Assume OAL is not a factor and you are using the same bullet
It does make a difference, particularly with how the neck expands and seals off the chamber. But I haven't seen where any difference is universal for any load configuration. My main focus regarding how a bullet is seated in the neck is to be sure that the bearing surface isn't engaging the neck-shoulder junction, which is easy to do with a somewhat short freebore and a large/long projectile. So, I've got to be sure the projectile(s) I'm using will work this way in my chamber, or have the freebore lengthened for the projectile I insist on using.I guess my question is whether to have less freebore and seat the bullet deeper in the neck or more freebore and seat it further out in the neck. Assume OAL is not a factor and you are using the same bullet
Seems like it would vary by bullet and load. Our riflesmith is always a fan of cartridges that have as much neck/bullet contact as possible for increasing neck tension consistency.I guess my question is whether to have less freebore and seat the bullet deeper in the neck or more freebore and seat it further out in the neck. Assume OAL is not a factor and you are using the same bullet
This is a good question. When you mention the tradeoff between how much of the bullet is in the freebore versus how much of the bullet is in the neck, there is something else to consider. The diameter of the freebore compared to the bullet diameter can be quite different. A couple examples the I'm aware of is the 223 Rem SAAMI chamber has a freebore diameter of 0.224", (the same diameter of the bullet), and the 300 Win Mag SAAMI chamber has a freebore diameter of 0.315", (0.007" larger than the bullet).I guess my question is whether to have less freebore and seat the bullet deeper in the neck or more freebore and seat it further out in the neck. Assume OAL is not a factor and you are using the same bullet
Dont understand why you say the bullet does not change neck tension . When you seat a bullet , it is going to expand the neck as an expander mandrel will .I agree with what's been said but I'm more confident with medium to long necks and moderate throat lengths. I've never gotten consistent accuracy out of extremely long FB's but have never been handicapped by shorter FB's as long as the neck shoulder junction doesn't come into play.
Neck tension is something we talk about but you can only get so much because the bullet acts as an expander. Try this. Seat a bullet and note the force required. Pull the bullet then reseat it. The neck tension didn't change because you pulled the bullet but there will be a noticeable decrease in the required seating force.
I have managed to obtain pretty decent precision with both .224" and .308" bullets seated having the boattail/bearing surface anywhere from well below the neck/shoulder junction to almost halfway out the neck. We're talking 0.25 to 0.3 MOA precision here, not BR level, but it's been more than sufficient for F-TR competition. The largest effect in this arena for me has always been effective case volume and operating pressure for a given load, rather than precision.I guess my question is whether to have less freebore and seat the bullet deeper in the neck or more freebore and seat it further out in the neck. Assume OAL is not a factor and you are using the same bullet
Thanks, I beginning to think there are no hard and fast rulesI have managed to obtain pretty decent precision with both .224" and .308" bullets seated having the boattail/bearing surface anywhere from well below the neck/shoulder junction to almost halfway out the neck. We're talking 0.25 to 0.3 MOA precision here, not BR level, but it's been more than sufficient for F-TR competition. The largest effect in this arena for me has always been effective case volume and operating pressure for a given load, rather than precision.
The only time I have experienced a bullet apparently not wanting to tune in that I believe might be from the amount of bearing surface in the neck was recently with a .308 Win F-TR rifle set up with a much longer than normal freebore for a longer heavier bullet. I also tried to develop a load with Berger's 200.20X bullet in this rifle, a bullet that typically tunes in extremely easily and well with about 3/4 of the neck length occupied with bullet bearing surface. In the rifle with much longer freebore, well under half a caliber of bearing surface was seated in the neck with the 200.20X bullet, and I could never get them to shoot reliably in that rifle. In fairness, I did not test a wide range of neck tension/interference fit during this process.
Unfortunately, that is a sample size of "1". I've heard many anecdotes from others suggesting that some bullets/loads can tune in quite well with as little as .050" to .010" bullet bearing surface in the neck. I suspect that there is no hard and fast rule, with different bullet/rifle combos each behaving in their own way. When setting up freebore length for a bullet I have not used before, I generally try to keep the bullet boattail/bearing surface junction visibly above the neck/shoulder, but not more than halfway out the neck.
gawd noI guess my question is whether to have less freebore and seat the bullet deeper in the neck or more freebore and seat it further out in the neck. Assume OAL is not a factor and you are using the same bullet