Yep looks like a serious case of overthinking- I’ve used it since it first came out - only thing I added was the remote trigger when I started messing around with big boomers, and the external battery pack of course because aa’s suckIs somebody way over thinking about this? I am 5 years into using my Labrador. It has never failed to work and the only variable I have seen is when my lot of powder changed. And that is exactly what it is supposed to do, let me know there is a change. Just like all the other changes from day to day.......
Some read, write, and type. Some shoot, compete, and win. First groups is pretty big. Second group not so much. If this opinion upsets you, guess what group your in.
So a Lab Radar helps how? Once your data is established and trajectories are known, any variation in speed, or in some cases distance is down to skill and experience.Long strings can be measured during informal shoots, but this only adds to the basic data.Not all of us shoot matches where we get sighters.
@Sandstorm It's OK John.What a passionate bunch we have.
See what you started Mrbarrel…lol
I am in the middle. I ask questions and type and then do my work, especially with a new tool. I am not a know it all and do something without asking or learning first.Some read, write, and type. Some shoot, compete, and win. First groups is pretty big. Second group not so much. If this opinion upsets you, guess what group your in.
So a Lab Radar helps how? Once your data is established and trajectories are known, any variation in speed, or in some cases distance is down to skill and experience.
No not offended. But much of what is on here is far from the quest of accurate shooting especially in a competitive arena. Sounds like an article that should be in an Electronics Magazine.I am in the middle. I ask questions and type and then do my work, especially with a new tool. I am not a know it all and do something without asking or learning first.
I know which group I am in and which you are in. I hope my opinion didn't offend anyone.
I posted the question in the general forum not the competition forum and I wanted to find out if different ranges and different environmental conditions will have an affect on the unit. and on a second note, I don't believe LR would advertise in the electronic magazines so my question is best asked in these forums.No not offended. But much of what is on here is far from the quest of accurate shooting especially in a competitive arena. Sounds like an article that should be in an Electronics Magazine.
First Labradar can never give you your exact correct muzzle velocity, because of all the variables in the whole Labradar system, as described by the manufacturer. First it doesn't measure muzzle velocity but calculates it, from micro waves that bounce back of a bullet;
First Labradar can never give you your exact correct muzzle velocity, because of all the variables in the whole Labradar system, as described by the manufacturer. First it doesn't measure muzzle velocity but calculates it, from micro waves that bounce back of a bullet, which can be interfered with by dozens of factors at one time making dozens of variables that would affect the outcome of the velocity calculations.
Need to read the manual for Labradar...the micro waves are definitely influenced by everything the atmosphere has to offer, temperature, humidity, etc. even dust. Temperature is a big one for those who live in hot and cold climates...it won't work, in the cold winter or hot summers. Plus varmint hunter who shoots faster than 3900 fps ...will get no reading its totally useless for 17, 204, 22-250, 220 swift, and many 6mm with light varmint bullets. And true no chronograph is perfect, but Labradar has way more variables that affect the measuring waves, plus the distances are farther down range than a few inches or 10 feet...increasing the distance, varying distance to detect the bullet base, changing to boatails, .17 bullets all affect it's accuracy ...and it is not measured velocity but calculation of variables velocity displayed on the screen, so it has more built in inaccuracies than most other systems.What chronograph does give you true muzzle velocity? Opticals are placed several to many feet downrange, the Magnetospeed sensor is a few inches downrange from the muzzle, and the LR has to wait for the bullet to enter the cone. The big difference I see is that LR back-calculates to get muzzle speed, while the others read and call that the muzzle speed (or ignore the muzzle part completely, and just read speed.)
BTW, Radio waves (at least as far as I know) are attenuated by atmospheric factors, but their speed is unchanged.
It ain't about splitting hairs...Labradar is a limited application chronograph, with lots of variables built in the system...plus heat and cold where it won't work. Or the real big down side...it can't read high velocities at all!...from most 17, 22, 6mm caliber large capacity varmint rifles, even a 17 hornet with 15.5 gr bullets.!...it isn't splitting hairs when Labradar is incapable of reading any these velocities, it says so in the manual. Labradar Can't tell how fast your 204 Ruger, 17 Remington, 22-250, 220 swift is shooting those varmint bullets...even my 6 dasher shoots 50 and 58 grain bullets above the capability of the Labradar chronograph...a modern chronograph should not be so limiting ...So how close do you want to split hairs ?? Our test with a Magneto Speed
showed only a 2 fps difference, using 2 different rifles and cartridges. I dug
out my ancient Ohler 33 and the results were not enough to argue about.