• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Test at 100 or 300

Understand that logic. But I guess we all get used to whatever we have access to. I only have 100 yds. that is easy access here at my shop. I would have to travel in order to shoot further distances.
If I recall correctly Bart tunes at one hundred as well so your in great company Bro’

I’m always in the minority…
 
This topic will never be settled. The fact is there are successful shooters in both camps. Short range vs long range tuning. Myself, I will always tune as far out as I can. But I have been doing it that way for 15 years, and have shot a lot and learned how to do it. 100 may be a better place to start. Tuning at longer ranges will give you some data you cant get at short range, but its a little trickier to do.
 
I'm not as accomplished as most so I had a friend work up a load for my new rifle at 100 yd w flags of course. What shot good at 100 didn't shoot good for me at 200 yd. I will go back to 100 and try that load again. Maybe it was me ,}
 
I'm not as accomplished as most so I had a friend work up a load for my new rifle at 100 yd w flags of course. What shot good at 100 didn't shoot good for me at 200 yd. I will go back to 100 and try that load again. Maybe it was me ,}
You really have to figure out why it did not work at 200. Was it the load/tune or something else? How were the groups at 200 different than those at 100?

The guys that tune at 100 have a system that they use. It would pay you to go back and read some of the old threads. The load they select is not a random good load. Instead they are tracking how the load develops and becomes stable and then unstable. Of course, that’s my read on it.
 
I bought a 6PPC this year and developed loads at 100. 3 shot groups identified a powder node, and 2 shot groups revealed the seating depth node. It will shoot better than anything else I own by a mile, and it's not bad according to the group sizes I hear others talk about. It will put 5 shots in the .1's, but there's always an outlier that makes it bigger. The problem with it is that the stock won't track straight. The buttstock is wider at the rear, and as soon as it sees recoil it has a mind of it's own if I try to shoot it free recoil. So I have to put my thumb on the back of the trigger, or just touch it with my shoulder. If I hold it, it can shoot decent. It won't shoot like that at 200 because any difference in pressure changes it, and it sprays.

Now if I only shot at 100 yards, I might just be happy with it, but since my range and the matches I go to are out to 200, I'm not, and just extrapolating group size at increasing range doesn't cut it. The load was tuned at 100, and it will shoot. Trying it at 200 shows the problems with gun handling and tracking under recoil that barely moves the needle at 100.
 
Ok ! Went to test and wind wasn’t bad so I said screw it and I tested at 300 with wind flag . Here’s the groups starting at 30.3 and ending at 31.6 of Reloder 15 with 90 Berger BT .01 in the lands . Opinions and schooling wanted but please be easy on me ! Lol . I am not using a $2K Seb , I’m using a bipod . 69509013-10C1-4D3D-8D22-70BB22840A2A.jpeg
 
Wish I could honestly answer that . I pretty much just waited for wind to die to shoot . I really need to learn to read wind .
This little wind cheat sheet was given to me by Rick Graham, (SR WR holder) it helps me understand basic single point wind direction V and impact O
 

Attachments

  • 5AA137CE-9BF6-4253-8263-0B69892587B8.jpeg
    5AA137CE-9BF6-4253-8263-0B69892587B8.jpeg
    419.7 KB · Views: 69
There’s a lot to be said about what distance testing should done.

I test initially at 100 yds on a calm day (if it doesn’t shoot at 100, it won’t further out), I’m looking for bug hole groups. If it’s calm, I do the same at 200. I need to know that the gun and load shoots, sans wind, as much as I can. I want a NO wind zero.

So, now I have a load that shoots, queue the wind, shooting out to at least 200 yards, 300 is better. Setup a spotting scope, focus on the target then back off a bit until you can see the mirage, watch which way it moves. Check the wind speed, either through environmentals or with a meter. Make a correlation between the mirage, enviromentals and the actual wind speed. With your known accurate load, hold and shoot dead center. Where did you hit? Three o’clock in the nine ring? Don’t reach for the dial, hold off half the distance on the other side of the bull. Same conditions, same mirage, shoot, where did it go…10 ring right side. Hold further left in the same condition, shoot, bingo center X.

Now you’ve got that one condition figured out, apply what you know to different directions and velocities. Every time you shoot you add info to your wind database in your head.

It takes a while, but when you’re in a match and you can hit Center X holding off near the eight ring or more, confidently, you have arrived.
 
First if your shooting without flags your wasting components and learning nothing, regardless of the distance. You have greater control of shooting in the same condition at 100 than a longer distance.
I'll add to this that if you're shooting in a wind condition that is beyond your ability to read accurately, even with wind flags, the results will likely be unsatisfactory (i.e. uninterpretable). Always use wind flags, and be prepared to pack up and go home if the conditions are sufficiently strong to interfere with clear interpretation of the results. I've ignored this notion on several occasions this year, which has been particularly windy where I live, and the result has been wasted rounds, meaningless targets, and having to repeat load development tests. It's hard to do when you've spent lots of time and effort loading rounds and traveling to the range, but sometimes knowing when the conditions aren't amenable to load development and going home is the best approach.
 
I'll add to this that if you're shooting in a wind condition that is beyond your ability to read accurately, even with wind flags, the results will likely be unsatisfactory (i.e. uninterpretable). Always use wind flags, and be prepared to pack up and go home if the conditions are sufficiently strong to interfere with clear interpretation of the results. I've ignored this notion on several occasions this year, which has been particularly windy where I live, and the result has been wasted rounds, meaningless targets, and having to repeat load development tests. It's hard to do when you've spent lots of time and effort loading rounds and traveling to the range, but sometimes knowing when the conditions aren't amenable to load development and going home is the best approach.
No doubt, every day is not good for load development. Some days you just need to turn around, go home, and weigh primers,lol.
 
No doubt, every day is not good for load development. Some days you just need to turn around, go home, and weigh primers,lol.
After being able to shoot into a 100 yd. hole in the woods where wind don't seem to bother I have learned sometimes it's not just the wind that contributes to the non-favorable conditions. Other atmospheric conditions can hamper load development.
 
If I recall correctly Bart tunes at one hundred as well so your in great company Bro’

I’m always in the minority…
Don't think that's gonna get you gubmint contracts! :D
As for testing I begin at 100 because if it won't work there it's not getting any better as the distance gets farther.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,982
Messages
2,207,150
Members
79,238
Latest member
claydunbar
Back
Top