Chronic 7 Saum brass unavailability has me convinced that it’s time to work a substitution into my F-Open options.
At about the same time the last Norma 7 Saum inventory remnants disappeared, I noticed that Lapua introduced 300 WM brass, and Peterson already made an L version (long) that didn’t head space off the belt.
30’s seem to be where frustrated 7mm barrel life chasers have been turning, and I’m wondering, is there is any reason not to chamber a long action cartridge?
My single shot actions were designed for the .338 LM anyway, and while I know a few years ago WSM brass supplies seemed likely to soon include tough, match grade brass makers like Lapua and Peterson, they haven’t joined the short mag party, and while ADG has, they haven’t kept up with demand.
Presently 300 WM brass by Lapua and Peterson is not only available, it’s also reasonably priced, - less than 300 WSM by a good margin.
If very heavy bullet/very slow burning powder is the expected formula and magazine length is irrelevant, any reason not to look at standard magnums?
At about the same time the last Norma 7 Saum inventory remnants disappeared, I noticed that Lapua introduced 300 WM brass, and Peterson already made an L version (long) that didn’t head space off the belt.
30’s seem to be where frustrated 7mm barrel life chasers have been turning, and I’m wondering, is there is any reason not to chamber a long action cartridge?
My single shot actions were designed for the .338 LM anyway, and while I know a few years ago WSM brass supplies seemed likely to soon include tough, match grade brass makers like Lapua and Peterson, they haven’t joined the short mag party, and while ADG has, they haven’t kept up with demand.
Presently 300 WM brass by Lapua and Peterson is not only available, it’s also reasonably priced, - less than 300 WSM by a good margin.
If very heavy bullet/very slow burning powder is the expected formula and magazine length is irrelevant, any reason not to look at standard magnums?