Going back to basics, there are four permutations 'out there':
1) Small primer (SP) + small flash-hole (SFH). Originally, this was only found in a small number of high-precision cartridges - 220 Russian/PPC, BRs, and Remington's UBBR 308 brass designed as a 'basic case' for reforming. When Lapua introduced its SP 'Palma' 308 Win case around 10 years ago, it adopted this form and again with the later 6.5X47mm Lapua, 6.5 Grendel, and its SP Creedmoors. Peterson and one or two others have picked up on the concept where they make SP versions of what are usually large primer numbers (243 Win, 260 Rem, 308 Win, Creedmoor). SFH dia. is nominally 1.5mm / 0.059".
2) All non-specialist SP designs such as 222/223 Rem, Hornet, Hornady version of 6.8mm Rem SPC etc use a small primer but the standard larger flash-hole (nominally 2mm / 0.079"). Surprisingly nobody has made special SFH variants to date.
3) Some makers of SP brass options such as Starline and PPU (Grendel brass) have stuck as per 2) with the larger flash-hole. There is a handful of cartridges where ammunition factories use either primer size, but again always with larger flash-holes - 6.8 Rem SPC SP if Hornady / LP if Remington; old Remington made UCC headstamp 7.62X39mm SP, the norm LP
4) 'Traditional' large case Large primer / large flash-hole. AFAIK, nobody makes an LP/SFH variant.
For an SFH reamer/uniformer, look up PPC/BR versions. (Sinclair Intnl, K&M and other specialist tool suppliers).
http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/03/brppc-flash-hole-deburring-tips/
http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com...rst-aid-clearing-obstructions-in-flash-holes/
I still use a Sinclair tool (in appropriate size) on Lapua brass of either type. I've found the
very occasional undersize example. This tool only uniforms the hole being indexed from the primer pocket and doesn't cut out punch-edges/spikes on the inside of the case. I gave up worrying about those in Lapua brass of either type a long, long time ago. Interestingly, for years we were told that the benefits of the exit-side debur operation wasn't just fraze removal but putting a small bevel or venturi onto the flash-hole, but the Litz book / chapter
@wkdickinson mentions also looks at that. Whilst the punch spike removal was very valuable in improving ignition consistency, there was no benefit found in bevelling the flash-hole.