Normally we use calibration procedures to determine the accuracy of instrumentation. We have no way to calibrate our chronographs so we can not evaluate their accuracy. We can infer some level of precision but not accuracy. We can decide if the results we get look reasonable but that is not an assessment of accuracy. We can put two or more chronographs side by side and if they agree that is some comfort but not rigorous. We can rely on the manufacturers estimate of accuracy but I do not see anyone putting a +/- 30 fps on their chronograph data.
That’s pretty hot you might want to back off that load a bitOut of the hundreds of shots fired with mine, only once did I have a crazy reading, either the Labradar was wrong, or I loaded a 6ppc that reached 7,475 fps.
That’s pretty hot you might want to back off that load a bit
Wow lost almost 6000fps in 10yds!!I ran the LRadar against the Magnetospeed and they were 5 fps different with the MS being ~5 fps faster consistently so it was good enough for me to unload the MS as it was more involved and affected group size.
BTW , everyone know PPC's are for girls, step up to a Creedmore if you can handle the horsepower. Or a CMM Creede More Mag... you heard it here firstView attachment 1173555
Out of the hundreds of shots fired with mine, only once did I have a crazy reading, either the Labradar was wrong, or I loaded a 6ppc that reached 7,475 fps.
The only time I lose confidence in mine is when the battery is getting low. It's thrown some strange numbers on a low battery.