• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

156 Berger Freebore ?

Anyone know what Freebore is needed for the 156 Berger ? Building another 6.5-284 for the 156 Berger. Guessing it'll work for the 150 SMK and 147 ELD as well.
 
The 150SMK and the 147ELD are worlds apart in the need for freebore. If you want to keep the bearing surface ABOVE the neck / shoulder junction with the 150SMKs, a .200 freebore is necessary. I bought 500 of the Hornady 147 ELDs>>> I looked at the bearing surface of those compared to the 150SMKs and I could not get them ANYWHERE NEAR where the bearing surface is above the neck / shoulder junction and NOT touch the lands! My best guess is you would need a .300 freebore! Now I don't know the bearing surface of the 156s BUT I do know Berger. My guess would be the 156 and the 150SMKs are going to be very close to needing the same freebore...
 
I have a .200 Freebore in one of my 6.5-284s and the 147s aren't too bad in that rifle. Could use more but curious about the 156. Thanks for the info. Didn't realize the 147s were that much different than the 150/156.
 
The 150SMK and the 147ELD are worlds apart in the need for freebore. If you want to keep the bearing surface ABOVE the neck / shoulder junction with the 150SMKs, a .200 freebore is necessary. I bought 500 of the Hornady 147 ELDs>>> I looked at the bearing surface of those compared to the 150SMKs and I could not get them ANYWHERE NEAR where the bearing surface is above the neck / shoulder junction and NOT touch the lands! My best guess is you would need a .300 freebore! Now I don't know the bearing surface of the 156s BUT I do know Berger. My guess would be the 156 and the 150SMKs are going to be very close to needing the same freebore...
I currently have two 6.5 x 284's that were cut with a .208 FB. The 147's are just above the neck/shoulder. I'll go longer next time. My lot of 147's have brg surf of .528-.529 The last lot of 150's measure .469-.471....this would be roughly .060 difference. Not sure what 156's are but I think ShootDots advice on a little more FB would be good.
 
I have a .200 Freebore in one of my 6.5-284s and the 147s aren't too bad in that rifle. Could use more but curious about the 156. Thanks for the info. Didn't realize the 147s were that much different than the 150/156.
The 147s have the shortest boattail I have ever seen in a match bullet. The boattail is about like a Nosler Ballistic Tip! Their bearing surface literally is so long it looks like a Telephone pole with a point! I did not even try to get them to shoot! I would also guess that because of the long bearing surface, TORQUE will be substantial!
 
They shoot fine in my current 8 twist barrel but I lose some case space. Still shooting them around 2950. Accuracy is decent but not as good as the 140 ELD/140 VLD/142 SMKs. Next barrel will be a 7.5 twist for the 150/156s. Throated for the 156s.
 
The 147s have the shortest boattail I have ever seen in a match bullet. The boattail is about like a Nosler Ballistic Tip! Their bearing surface literally is so long it looks like a Telephone pole with a point! I did not even try to get them to shoot! I would also guess that because of the long bearing surface, TORQUE will be substantial!
You are correct! When I first started shooting them I was concerned about the long bearing surface, but man they shoot good. Never had them out to 1,000 and long strings. Shot a 6.5 inch 5 shot group last year with them at 1400 yds. They may not hold up under extreme conditions but for 5 shot groups they are great!
 
You are correct! When I first started shooting them I was concerned about the long bearing surface, but man they shoot good. Never had them out to 1,000 and long strings. Shot a 6.5 inch 5 shot group last year with them at 1400 yds. They may not hold up under extreme conditions but for 5 shot groups they are great!
That is excellent shooting my friend! I do not doubt they are good bullets. The thing I have against them is that IF you get the PROPER freebore for them, you have limited yourself to that bullet only! What happens if your particular barrel doe not like them? You would literally have to rechamber the barrel and get a MUCH shorter freebore. On the other hand, if your barrel does like them>>>you will have a very good bullet and the capability of winning matches!
 
That is excellent shooting my friend! I do not doubt they are good bullets. The thing I have against them is that IF you get the PROPER freebore for them, you have limited yourself to that bullet only! What happens if your particular barrel doe not like them? You would literally have to rechamber the barrel and get a MUCH shorter freebore. On the other hand, if your barrel does like them>>>you will have a very good bullet and the capability of winning matches!
Yes sir, I've won a couple of local 530 yd matches shooting them in a 6.5 x 47. I have another 6.5 x 47 I cut the barrel down to 21.5 inches to play around with local 100/200 bench guys. This gun shoots the 150 smk at 1's and 2's all day long. Out of 5 groups my largest group was .326
I may try the 156 in the gun. Now for the anomaly....the same gun does not shoot the 147 at short distance but shoots at 3-500 well. Opposite with 150 smk, shoots great at 100....opens to .65-.75 moa at 300. 8tw barrel....any suggestions?
 
Yes sir, I've won a couple of local 530 yd matches shooting them in a 6.5 x 47. I have another 6.5 x 47 I cut the barrel down to 21.5 inches to play around with local 100/200 bench guys. This gun shoots the 150 smk at 1's and 2's all day long. Out of 5 groups my largest group was .326
I may try the 156 in the gun. Now for the anomaly....the same gun does not shoot the 147 at short distance but shoots at 3-500 well. Opposite with 150 smk, shoots great at 100....opens to .65-.75 moa at 300. 8tw barrel....any suggestions?
That is the conundrum with bullets made for long-range. They will generally shoot better at longer ranges than at close range. The short-range BR guys shoot flat base bullets of nominal b.c. for 1 reason, they shoot great at close range! They don't need a boattail nor a high b.c. bullet for 100-200 yards. Try shooting a 62gr / 6mm bullet at 500-600 yards and watch what happens. Conversely, shoot a HIGH b.c. bullet at short range. They may shoot "pretty good" but they will NOT beat on a consistent basis a flat base bullet! High b.c. bullets, for lack of better terminology, "hold" on to accuracy far longer than a short, flat base bullet. One time (and only one time) I shot a 5/8" 5 shot group at 600 yards with a 130Berger VLD out of a 6.5 x 47. That is down in the vicinity of 1/8th m.o.a.! That is "close range benchrest accuracy" held out to 600 yards!
 
That is the conundrum with bullets made for long-range. They will generally shoot better at longer ranges than at close range. The short-range BR guys shoot flat base bullets of nominal b.c. for 1 reason, they shoot great at close range! They don't need a boattail nor a high b.c. bullet for 100-200 yards. Try shooting a 62gr / 6mm bullet at 500-600 yards and watch what happens. Conversely, shoot a HIGH b.c. bullet at short range. They may shoot "pretty good" but they will NOT beat on a consistent basis a flat base bullet! Hig b.c. bullets, for lack of better terminology, "hold" on to accuracy far longer than a short, flat base bullet. One time (and only one time) I shot a 5/8" 5 shot group at 600 yards with a 130Berger VLD out of a 6.5 x 47. That is down in the vicinity of 1/8th m.o.a.! That is "close range benchrest accuracy" held out to 600 yards!
Yes sir, thats great shooting...I;ve shot well with 130's also. Years ago I shot this gun as a PPC and shot the FB column bullet. I turned it into a 6.5 x 47 and now the shorter barrel. Shooting the 150's just because I have a ton of them and at 100/200 they drive those little bullet guys crazy in the wind. Just having fun and wondering if there is something I'm overlooking! With short barrel I'm shooting them around 2700. I'm really amazed how well the 150 shoots at short distance.
 
Yes sir, thats great shooting...I;ve shot well with 130's also. Years ago I shot this gun as a PPC and shot the FB column bullet. I turned it into a 6.5 x 47 and now the shorter barrel. Shooting the 150's just because I have a ton of them and at 100/200 they drive those little bullet guys crazy in the wind. Just having fun and wondering if there is something I'm overlooking! With short barrel I'm shooting them around 2700. I'm really amazed how well the 150 shoots at short distance.
I don't think you're missing anything! Shooting a HIGH b.c. bullet and shooting them well at close range is not an easy accomplishment! I think you must be doing everything right>>>not missing anything!
 
So my rough measurements are the 140 Hybrid has a bearing surface of about .390”, the 156 Berger has about .490” and the 150SMK .475”.

Here’s a pic L-Rt
140 Berger Hybrid
142 SMK
150 SMK
156 Berger
 

Attachments

  • C44EE2AC-57EB-4088-8198-DEEE6204083B.jpeg
    C44EE2AC-57EB-4088-8198-DEEE6204083B.jpeg
    404.1 KB · Views: 244
@swd,
How close are the bearing surfaces between the 150 SMK and the 156 Berger?
If I didn't know better, I would thing I was looking at the 7mm 183 SMK next to the 184 Berger.
Thanks,

Lloyd
 
@swd,
How close are the bearing surfaces between the 150 SMK and the 156 Berger?
If I didn't know better, I would thing I was looking at the 7mm 183 SMK next to the 184 Berger.
Thanks,

Lloyd
I saw where they are advertising a .545 bearing surface for the 156, but I have never measured one. SWD says .490 which is .015 more than 150
 
@swd,
How close are the bearing surfaces between the 150 SMK and the 156 Berger?
If I didn't know better, I would thing I was looking at the 7mm 183 SMK next to the 184 Berger.
Thanks,

Lloyd
The 156 is about .020” longer than the 150SMK
 
So a little pressure testing in the back yard today. 6.5x55 Ackley/BJAI with RL23, I went up to 2956 without ejector marks or sticky bolt lift. Primers looking good. The same charge weight with 140 Hybrids is 20fps slower. My guess is the thinner hunting jackets don't build as much pressure despite the much longer bearing surface. In my rifle 3000+ looks like it would be easy but being an F Open rifle I don't need or want that much speed. Off to the range probably next week and a match in two weeks.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,310
Messages
2,216,094
Members
79,543
Latest member
drzaous
Back
Top