This Just in From Oregon

[Texas10]

I write for entertainment purposes and to provoke thought Medic. If you don't like it, hit the back button. If you want to learn something other than shooting skills, you're in the wrong place.

Or do I have that all wrong too?

 

[Medic505]

If you weren't around for Watergate and Nixons fall from grace, you're in luck. History is about to repeat itself.

I did hit the back button. You made a prediction. I simply ask how you came to this conclusion.

 

[Texas10]

Sorry, Medic. I got a little testy there, needed to eat something. I apologize to you.

I wasn't making a prediction, nor drawing a conclusion. But in listening to all sides, reading the court documents and the recent errors in redacting court documents for the Southern District of New York, It's become clear to me that Mueller has had the end game in sight all along, and he has been releasing information in court filings so that his final report could not be squelched by Republican comrades in the House Judiciary Committee (no longer an issue since the midterms) or if a new AG came into play (it did). It seems to me he would do that for only one reason, and it wouldn't be because it (the report) exonerates Trump.

But the Southern District Court is an entirely different matter, and it looks way worse. They've already got a string of convictions, and apparently they're not done. And they are unfettered by the political winds in Washington.

Now tell me, cause I'm always open to new information, how does that all add up to you?

 

[Joe Salt]

Texas10 I myself still think it's all still a WITCH HUNT!
If they had anything it would have been out there by now.
DELAY DELAY DELAY

Joe Salt

 

[oldduc]

Texas10 I myself still think it's all still a WITCH HUNT!
If they had anything it would have been out there by now.
DELAY DELAY DELAY

Joe Salt

You're right, it is a WITCH hunt and I think they're getting pretty damn close to burning that WITCH, or would that be a WARLOCK?

 

[Dusty Stevens]

Sorry, Medic. I got a little testy there, needed to eat something. I apologize to you.

I wasn't making a prediction, nor drawing a conclusion. But in listening to all sides, reading the court documents and the recent errors in redacting court documents for the Southern District of New York, It's become clear to me that Mueller has had the end game in sight all along, and he has been releasing information in court filings so that his final report could not be squelched by Republican comrades in the House Judiciary Committee (no longer an issue since the midterms) or if a new AG came into play (it did). It seems to me he would do that for only one reason, and it wouldn't be because it (the report) exonerates Trump.

But the Southern District Court is an entirely different matter, and it looks way worse. They've already got a string of convictions, and apparently they're not done. And they are unfettered by the political winds in Washington.

Now tell me, cause I'm always open to new information, how does that all add up to you?

Theyre getting folks for totally unrelated crimes from way back. Do you honestly think that if there was a smoking gun or even a hint of guilt it wouldnt be out there?

 

[Knotwild]

In my favorite dream, everyone would stop paying for any media period, stop paying taxes, and live off the land as much as possible, while ceasing to buy new anything, and most importantly not borrowing a dime. People would stop suing, and we all help each other along. Then sit back and watch "their" world collapse around them. As long as we play the game, we lose.

When you pay for media, you pay for propaganda to come into your home. The media foments division and anger just as the rulers do. When you borrow money to buy something you can't afford, you become their slave. Once unrest erupts they will use every asset to subdue the public and remove freedom.

Right before our eyes, businesses are growing so large that they can actually dictate our lives and laws. And the rulers define them as "too big to fail" using our money to support them. And, when we buy from them and invest in them, we finance them.

But nobody sees, like the frog in the water with the temp slowly rising.

 

[Papa Charlie]

Last I knew, the Constitution and its Amendments was written by and for both parties.

Actually, they were signed by both parties but the Amendments were not a part of the Constitution. They were added as an amendment to the Constitution over two years later. The first ten amendments were written by James Madison. Madison was a supporter of protecting the peoples rights against government and the then controlling body of the Federal Party. The Federal Party came into power around 1790 or '92 and was a national coalition of bankers and businessmen in support of Alexander Hamilton's fiscal policies.

The Democratic-Republican party wasn't established until later, I think around 1800 and was proposed by Thomas Jefferson and supported by Madison to opposition to Hamilton and the Federalist Party. Madison served as Jefferson's Secretary of State after Jefferson became President.

My point is, that the Democrats have never really been a big supporter of the first ten Amendments.

 

[JimT]

Sorry, Medic. I got a little testy there, needed to eat something. I apologize to you.

I wasn't making a prediction, nor drawing a conclusion. But in listening to all sides, reading the court documents and the recent errors in redacting court documents for the Southern District of New York, It's become clear to me that Mueller has had the end game in sight all along, and he has been releasing information in court filings so that his final report could not be squelched by Republican comrades in the House Judiciary Committee (no longer an issue since the midterms) or if a new AG came into play (it did). It seems to me he would do that for only one reason, and it wouldn't be because it (the report) exonerates Trump.

But the Southern District Court is an entirely different matter, and it looks way worse. They've already got a string of convictions, and apparently they're not done. And they are unfettered by the political winds in Washington.

Now tell me, cause I'm always open to new information, how does that all add up to you?

Why don’t you supply us with the specifics of those “Southern District Court” convictions and how they pertain directly to our current president.

Please give us your expert opinion on how Cohen’s guilty plea re payments to Horseface differs from Edwards payments to his mistress which were held not to be illegal campaign contributions.

 

[338 Mollett]

My first question to liberals during a bar room debate is "Why start enforcing these laws now? They didn't apply just 4 years ago ? "

 

[centerlineseal]

But nobody sees, like the frog in the water with the temp slowly rising.

Oh, ... a lot of us see. Question is, ... What is to be done? No easy answer. All I can posit is that the "Great Disruptor" currently in the White House is doing us all a favor in exposing both parties and ALL politicians for the charlatans and elites they actually are. Where it all goes and what happens tomorrow is unknown.

Best have our affairs and family needs in order. No different than the last 10,000 years of human history.

 

[Medic505]

Sorry, Medic. I got a little testy there, needed to eat something. I apologize to you.

I wasn't making a prediction, nor drawing a conclusion. But in listening to all sides, reading the court documents and the recent errors in redacting court documents for the Southern District of New York, It's become clear to me that Mueller has had the end game in sight all along, and he has been releasing information in court filings so that his final report could not be squelched by Republican comrades in the House Judiciary Committee (no longer an issue since the midterms) or if a new AG came into play (it did). It seems to me he would do that for only one reason, and it wouldn't be because it (the report) exonerates Trump.

But the Southern District Court is an entirely different matter, and it looks way worse. They've already got a string of convictions, and apparently they're not done. And they are unfettered by the political winds in Washington.

Now tell me, cause I'm always open to new information, how does that all add up to you?

Apology accepted, no harm, no foul. I remember well the Nixon fiasco, Tricky Dick got what he had coming to him. I just don't see a correlation with then and now. If the Special Council has the goods, lets see it. They have pooped off millions of dollars just because the President doesn't fit the mold of a Washington insider. And, all I can say about that is, good for him. I'm just tired of speculation.

"I am not a crook"!

 

[Texas10]

Why don’t you supply us with the specifics of those “Southern District Court” convictions and how they pertain directly to our current president.

Please give us your expert opinion on how Cohen’s guilty plea re payments to Horseface differs from Edwards payments to his mistress which were held not to be illegal campaign contributions.

I leave it to you to search for those answers, I'm pretty sure you don't want to hear them from me. As for the difference between Cohen and Edwards, it was all in the timing. Edwards wasn't running for office when he tried to squelch the rumors. And in Trumps case, the timing is everything.

 

[Texas10]

Actually, they were signed by both parties but the Amendments were not a part of the Constitution. They were added as an amendment to the Constitution over two years later. The first ten amendments were written by James Madison. Madison was a supporter of protecting the peoples rights against government and the then controlling body of the Federal Party. The Federal Party came into power around 1790 or '92 and was a national coalition of bankers and businessmen in support of Alexander Hamilton's fiscal policies.

The Democratic-Republican party wasn't established until later, I think around 1800 and was proposed by Thomas Jefferson and supported by Madison to opposition to Hamilton and the Federalist Party. Madison served as Jefferson's Secretary of State after Jefferson became President.

My point is, that the Democrats have never really been a big supporter of the first ten Amendments.

Sounds like you know your history, P.C.

One more thing to remember, Democrats and Republicans switched party platforms starting around 1900 and finalizing as Obama was elected. So to clarify, the "Democrats" you speak of are actually the "Republicans" of today . Here's a quick read.https://www.livescience.com/34241-democratic-republican-parties-switch-platforms.html

 

[Dusty Stevens]

The brainwashing is still going on... and succeeding! He who controls the media and education controls the populace.

 

[timeout]

Okay, you sucked me in. A special counsel should only be initiated to investigate a crime. Since collusion isn't a crime, the Mueller investigation is illegal. He is actually doing investigation in search of a crime, rather than investigating an actual crime.

 

[jonbearman]

Truthfully when are people going demonstrate in mass to try and stop this draconian plan.

 

[Bob L.]

So much for "Just say no to political threads."

 

[Bc'z]

Y'all need to check out agenda 21.
As do I.
Wife's been going on about it for a couple weeks now.

 

[centerlineseal]

So much for "Just say no to political threads."

I wouldn't term this a "political thread". There are constitutional issues here that will directly affect our hobbies, pastimes, lifestyles and god given rights. I welcome the discourse.