Does anyone know the barrel life of a .22 br? Looking for life until loss of .4"-.5" grouping at 100 yards. Thanks
Doesn’t surprise me at all.there is a guy at the range has shot about 4000, still shoots 1/2"
So 6mm is more inherently accurate why? And where do we draw the .5 conclusion from exactly?There are two many variables here to give a comprehensive answer. For one, it's possible that this would be the best accuracy at the very beginning. While a 22 BR is accurate, it is less so than a 6 BR or 6 PPC. In the hands of the average shooter .5 MOA would be about right. Then it will depend on which bullet. A heavier bullet, meaning a higher pressure load will erode the throat faster.
You might tell us what twist and what bullet you intend to use and you can maybe get a clearer answer.
Rick
So 6mm is more inherently accurate why? And where do we draw the .5 conclusion from exactly?
My shot out barrel will still shoot under .5 after rechambering. If the new barrel does not shoot close to .250 with a little load work I would be incredibly surprised.
Not trying to piss anyone off. But having a rifle that will accomplish an occasional 3 shot group in the .2's is far different than a rifle that will consistently agg in the .2's. I just looked up the results from the NBRSA Regional Match at River Bend in November. 2nd place went to an agg in the low .2's. The next 10-12 places were aggs. in the .2's. After that it was .3's and I think near the end some .4's. My point being, these are the most accurate rifles available handled by accomplished shooters and they are struggling to shoot aggs in the .2's. I'm not criticizing you are your rifle, but I'm comfortable saying that a 22BR with over 2000 rounds won't agg in the .2's. It wouldn't do that the day after it was chambered.I have not been able to shoot out a .22BR yet. I have several with well ever 2500 rounds that will still shoot from .25 to .375 moa easily. They just keep on going. One of my all time favorite rounds. If a new barrel will not group in the .2's there is something wrong. At least in my experience.
Paul
Not trying to piss anyone off. But having a rifle that will accomplish an occasional 3 shot group in the .2's is far different than a rifle that will consistently agg in the .2's. I just looked up the results from the NBRSA Regional Match at River Bend in November. 2nd place went to an agg in the low .2's. The next 10-12 places were aggs. in the .2's. After that it was .3's and I think near the end some .4's. My point being, these are the most accurate rifles available handled by accomplished shooters and they are struggling to shoot aggs in the .2's. I'm not criticizing you are your rifle, but I'm comfortable saying that a 22BR with over 2000 rounds won't agg in the .2's. It wouldn't do that the day after it was chambered.
Rick
Yes. Works fine. 7 twist here and plan to do some work with the 95s also. Have not done enough to make any confident conclusions. At some point I will put up my results after I am comfy with things.Anyone shoot 88 or 90s with xbr in a .22 br?
Valid points, Rick, but it doesn't make the "keyboard shooters" dishonest in saying their rifles shoot 0.2moa. They just don't look at aggregates as the measure of how accurate their rifle is. They dismiss the occasional flier as a mistake or bad bullet and the bad groups when they feel like they aren't shooting well. They look at the good 5-shot groups from the good days and say, that's what it can do without me messing it up. Many well built rifles will shoot in the 2's with these rules applied, and it's not a dishonest approach to accuracy, it's just a different standard.My point being, these are the most accurate rifles available handled by accomplished shooters and they are struggling to shoot aggs in the .2's. I'm not criticizing you are your rifle, but I'm comfortable saying that a 22BR with over 2000 rounds won't agg in the .2's. It wouldn't do that the day after it was chambered.
Yes. Works fine. 7 twist here and plan to do some work with the 95s also. Have not done enough to make any confident conclusions. At some point I will put up my results after I am comfy with things.