• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

.22 br barrel life

If you’re talking match SS, generally couple thousand rounds give or take. Moderate speeds will extend it some.
 
Last edited:
There are two many variables here to give a comprehensive answer. For one, it's possible that this would be the best accuracy at the very beginning. While a 22 BR is accurate, it is less so than a 6 BR or 6 PPC. In the hands of the average shooter .5 MOA would be about right. Then it will depend on which bullet. A heavier bullet, meaning a higher pressure load will erode the throat faster.
You might tell us what twist and what bullet you intend to use and you can maybe get a clearer answer.

Rick
 
I'm going to SWAG 2000 rounds, give or take, with cool burning powders, heavy bullets, and medium pressures.

Warm loads, with Varget or H4895, and heavies, 1500, but I'm gambling the odds.
 
I've consumed 2 .22BR barrels with the majority of the work in P-dog towns. Both barrels would shoot less than .2xx when new and would still shoot less than .600 when I trashed them. The throats got rough enough to start damaging jackets and smoke trailing to the target. They both lasted about 3500 rounds. They will last longer than most people think.
 
There are two many variables here to give a comprehensive answer. For one, it's possible that this would be the best accuracy at the very beginning. While a 22 BR is accurate, it is less so than a 6 BR or 6 PPC. In the hands of the average shooter .5 MOA would be about right. Then it will depend on which bullet. A heavier bullet, meaning a higher pressure load will erode the throat faster.
You might tell us what twist and what bullet you intend to use and you can maybe get a clearer answer.

Rick
So 6mm is more inherently accurate why? And where do we draw the .5 conclusion from exactly?
My shot out barrel will still shoot under .5 after rechambering. If the new barrel does not shoot close to .250 with a little load work I would be incredibly surprised.
 
So 6mm is more inherently accurate why? And where do we draw the .5 conclusion from exactly?
My shot out barrel will still shoot under .5 after rechambering. If the new barrel does not shoot close to .250 with a little load work I would be incredibly surprised.

Scoreboard. In nearly twenty years of benchrest competition I've never seen a single 22BR ...ever. Possible reason is overbore. Whatever the case, they are not as accurate as the calibers I mentioned. Don't blame me, it is what it is. You have a decent barrel, good for you. Although .5 isn't all that great.
Barrels that will agg .25 aren't all that common although keyboard shooters would say otherwise. Maybe I should clarify that. 2.5 MOA rifles in the hands of keyboard shooters aren't that common.

Rick
 
I have not been able to shoot out a .22BR yet. I have several with well ever 2500 rounds that will still shoot from .25 to .375 moa easily. They just keep on going. One of my all time favorite rounds. If a new barrel will not group in the .2's there is something wrong. At least in my experience.:D:D

Paul
 
I have not been able to shoot out a .22BR yet. I have several with well ever 2500 rounds that will still shoot from .25 to .375 moa easily. They just keep on going. One of my all time favorite rounds. If a new barrel will not group in the .2's there is something wrong. At least in my experience.:D:D

Paul
Not trying to piss anyone off. But having a rifle that will accomplish an occasional 3 shot group in the .2's is far different than a rifle that will consistently agg in the .2's. I just looked up the results from the NBRSA Regional Match at River Bend in November. 2nd place went to an agg in the low .2's. The next 10-12 places were aggs. in the .2's. After that it was .3's and I think near the end some .4's. My point being, these are the most accurate rifles available handled by accomplished shooters and they are struggling to shoot aggs in the .2's. I'm not criticizing you are your rifle, but I'm comfortable saying that a 22BR with over 2000 rounds won't agg in the .2's. It wouldn't do that the day after it was chambered.

Rick
 
Not trying to piss anyone off. But having a rifle that will accomplish an occasional 3 shot group in the .2's is far different than a rifle that will consistently agg in the .2's. I just looked up the results from the NBRSA Regional Match at River Bend in November. 2nd place went to an agg in the low .2's. The next 10-12 places were aggs. in the .2's. After that it was .3's and I think near the end some .4's. My point being, these are the most accurate rifles available handled by accomplished shooters and they are struggling to shoot aggs in the .2's. I'm not criticizing you are your rifle, but I'm comfortable saying that a 22BR with over 2000 rounds won't agg in the .2's. It wouldn't do that the day after it was chambered.

Rick

Rick,

Maybe those guys just can't shoot!! Lmao!!:D:D

Paul
 
My point being, these are the most accurate rifles available handled by accomplished shooters and they are struggling to shoot aggs in the .2's. I'm not criticizing you are your rifle, but I'm comfortable saying that a 22BR with over 2000 rounds won't agg in the .2's. It wouldn't do that the day after it was chambered.
Valid points, Rick, but it doesn't make the "keyboard shooters" dishonest in saying their rifles shoot 0.2moa. They just don't look at aggregates as the measure of how accurate their rifle is. They dismiss the occasional flier as a mistake or bad bullet and the bad groups when they feel like they aren't shooting well. They look at the good 5-shot groups from the good days and say, that's what it can do without me messing it up. Many well built rifles will shoot in the 2's with these rules applied, and it's not a dishonest approach to accuracy, it's just a different standard.

Yes. Works fine. 7 twist here and plan to do some work with the 95s also. Have not done enough to make any confident conclusions. At some point I will put up my results after I am comfy with things.

What kind of speeds are you seeing? Do you think an 8 twist would be ok with the 88s? I've got a 1:14 twist 22-250 that I'm bored with, so I'm thinking about re-barrelling to a fast twist 22-250 or a 22BR for a change of pace and like the idea of running as slow a twist as I can get away with.

Just for fun, Rick :D:

My 22-250 shoots 5 shot groups like this occasionally:
22-250.jpg
53gn SMK, 35.2gn IMR-4064, Winchester brass and 1973 RWS primers.

I've got to wait for the good days where all the flags are hanging straight down for it to reward me with these kinds of groups. Good days will net maybe 2 groups like this, but not consecutively. All too often, being a human being (a.k.a. keyboard shooter) and not a benchrest shooter, I start to pull the 5th one out as I get too excited about how well I'm doing. I like to dismiss that group and keep shooting, all the while confidently telling myself and others that my rifle shoots 1/4 minute or better (so I'm really just lying to everyone, including myself:D:p:D).
 
My 22BR running 75s and 80s is around 700-900 rounds is still shooting tiny little groups.

I scoped it a few months ago and she looks pretty good.

I’d guess 2500 rounds should be easy to obtain.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,839
Messages
2,204,562
Members
79,157
Latest member
Bud1029
Back
Top