• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Spin drift

If youre not shooting beyond 1k then dont worry about it, just get your dope and call it good. You wont miss because you didnt take it into account. Many people turn it off entirely in their calculators because they can actually over estimate its effects.
 
For traditionally stabilized bullets at 30 calibers per turn or more, I use 2% of drop. For faster twists of 28 calibers and less, I use 1% of drop.
 
For traditionally stabilized bullets at 30 calibers per turn or more, I use 2% of drop. For faster twists of 28 calibers and less, I use 1% of drop.
huhh?

Please a'splain......... you're saying the angle of the yaw of repose of a faster rpm bullet is LESS than that of a bullet spun more slowly?

And how does a normal person figure "drop?"
 
Applied ballisticsllc.com has some good free articles on just about everything...scroll down to the article section....
 
Is spin drift and coriolis the same thing? I'm guessing one is caused by the earth spin and the other by rifling.
 
Is spin drift and coriolis the same thing? I'm guessing one is caused by the earth spin and the other by rifling.

Yes, spin drift is caused by the spin on the bullet from the rifling. Coriolis is from the earths rotation. I've never considered coriolis in a shot.

Spin drift will come into play shooting at 1000 yards on an F class target when you get a wind that is fishtailing (i.e, switching left to right). If you are shooting with a 100 yard zero then at 1000 yards your no wind zero is ~½ to 3/4 MOA left of your 100 yard zero. In a Fullbore match where you can't wait for your condition to come back and you have to make the wind call shooting at a 1MOA 10-ring that is enough of an error to cost you a point if you haven't accounted for it.

Just for example. You have a wind from your left, you've taken your sighters and you need 1MOA left to be centered up shooting 10s/Xs and the wind crossed over to the right. If you weren't accounting for your spin drift you actually had ¼ to ½ left on. The wind crosses over, and the wind looks about the same as the wind you were just shooting in but from the right, so you put on/hold 1MOA right, except now that ½ to 3/4MOA is added to your dope, not subtracted, and you've got 1 ½ to 1 3/4 right on in a wind that only needs ¼ to ½. You are lucky if you don't end up in the 8 ring.
 
Advice, For us old folk that can't remember, would it be better to put the spin drift into our zero, another words our 1000 wind zero is including the calculated spin drift. Thanks
 
huhh?

Please a'splain......... you're saying the angle of the yaw of repose of a faster rpm bullet is LESS than that of a bullet spun more slowly?

And how does a normal person figure "drop?"
I don't figure drop, my ballistics program tells me, or I shoot it to find out, you know, 3.1 mils at 500 yards....10.1 mils at 1000yards etc..

As for the rest, you can read the paper on coning theory by Jim Boatwright yourself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't figure drop, my ballistics program tells me, or I shoot it to find out, you know, 3.1 mils at 500 yards....10.1 mils at 1000yards etc..

As for the rest, you can read the paper on coning theory by Jim Boatwright yourself.
I don't agree with Boatwright much, since he disagrees with Vaughn, Rinker, McCoy et al. Especially on things like coning angle, nutation and yaw of repose. Heck, even the "Sierra Techs" useta' disagree with the real ballisticians but they rewrote their books a couple yrs ago because of controversy (and the fact that they were wrong lol...) Boatwright still tries to "prove" everybody else is wrong.......

Regarding your first part about "I don't figure drop"...... that's just meaningless unless you actually DEFINE something as datum. Boreline? LOS? 100yd zero? 1000yd zero???

"3.1 mils"

"10.1 mils"

From WHAT??

From what reference?

I get to paraphrase FGuffeY here...... "numbers are meaningless without a reference"
 
I don't agree with Boatwright much, since he disagrees with Vaughn, Rinker, McCoy et al. Especially on things like coning angle, nutation and yaw of repose. Heck, even the "Sierra Techs" useta' disagree with the real ballisticians but they rewrote their books a couple yrs ago because of controversy (and the fact that they were wrong lol...) Boatwright still tries to "prove" everybody else is wrong.......

Regarding your first part about "I don't figure drop"...... that's just meaningless unless you actually DEFINE something as datum. Boreline? LOS? 100yd zero? 1000yd zero???

"3.1 mils"

"10.1 mils"

From WHAT??

From what reference?

I get to paraphrase FGuffeY here...... "numbers are meaningless without a reference"
You just gotta be THAT GUY huh?
 
Is spin drift and coriolis the same thing? I'm guessing one is caused by the earth spin and the other by rifling.
Coriolis is from the earth spinning..... picture yourself standing on a big record player turntable and rolling a ball. Coriolis drives the bullet path to the RIGHT in the northern hemisphere. Always. But only 2-3 inches at 1000yds (and actually, it's the earth moving out from under...)

"spin drift" is actually a drag function. A bullet is dragged by it's tail. Basically wherever the tail points it is driven that way by deceleration. So when a bullet points it's nose INTO the wind (this is what a bullet does, regardless what Boatwright sez) it's tail is pointed down-wind so it's dragged downwind. And due to something called "yaw of repose" it's not point EXACTLY into the felt wind, it's got some lag. This slight lag orients the butt of the bullet just slightly "right" of the felt wind. In the case of wind on a bullet, "right" is UP in a right/left wind and DOWN in a wind from left to right so bullets blown to the left hit high and bullets blown to the right hit low. (Again, these are FACTS not Boatwright's opinions. Real scientists took pixtures even, to "prove" the math....)

A forward moving but falling bullet has a wind on it's belly.

The wind on it's belly means it's dragged to the RIGHT 8"-10" at 1K

Now, can we SEE IT?? Dunno.... II don't know if I can.

Between the two I figger 4" right at 600 and 12" right at 1000 but I can't really observe it.

I shoot in my own yard.

About 15yrs ago we were shooting 1000yds on an absolutely perfect evening. We could spot "wishes" in the air for a half mile and the whole air mass was nearly static. We THOUGHT, we BELIEVED that that day we actually observed "spin drift" but today, having spent 25yrs trying to even find a "dead-air zero" with limited success........ I no longer believe we saw it.

Others' experience will differ but that's been mine.
 
You just gotta be THAT GUY huh?
not sure what that means but I do enjoy facts


opinions, not so much


but I will shut up now....... it took me a while to work up the seeds to post this on this pertickler forum, I shall now withdraw forthwith :)

sorry to have stepped into your room
 
not sure what that means but I do enjoy facts


opinions, not so much


but I will shut up now....... it took me a while to work up the seeds to post this on this pertickler forum, I shall now withdraw forthwith :)

sorry to have stepped into your room
Geez, I enjoyed the explanation. I too love facts, having been in Law Enforcement for 37 years I lived with facts. You didn't step on any toes at all, and as I am the OP here, I get to decide who can stay. :) :)
 
not sure what that means but I do enjoy facts opinions, not so much, sorry to have stepped into your room
So you bust into a thread...stomping dicks....and I'm the asshole?o_O

I don't agree with Boatwright much, since he disagrees with Vaughn, Rinker, McCoy et al. Especially on things like coning angle, nutation and yaw of repose. Heck, even the "Sierra Techs" useta' disagree with the real ballisticians but they rewrote their books a couple yrs ago because of controversy (and the fact that they were wrong lol...) Boatwright still tries to "prove" everybody else is wrong.......
When can we expect your peer reviewed papers on this matter?:rolleyes:
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,114
Messages
2,189,815
Members
78,688
Latest member
C120
Back
Top