Rifleman700,
if you had some serious illness, would you opt for a procedure that had this miniscule amount of testing?
There was no established criteria, and no real protocols for the testing. A one mile per hour wind would have moved the poi farther. And there is no real means of timing shots with the wind.
I do not know if you ever read Precision Shooting Magazine back in the old days. Merrill Martin was a wealthy man in the Bay area. Machinery Manufacturer. He had the only serious repeatable method of tuning in the wind I have ever seen or heard of in the early-mid nineties. He bought about a dozen weather stations, complete with wind vane system, and had them linked. It allowed him to test loads with a monitor readout that showed the wind direction and speed along the bullet flight path to 100 yards. It could show wind direction in degrees from 1-360 degrees, and mph in .1 increments.
The only other true testing was done about the same time, in the famous "Houston Warehouse". There, they only tested to see accuracy in a true Zero Condition.
The only valid comparison has to be done indoors, like they do at Picatinny Arsenal in their underground test facility. Otherwise there are too many unquantifiable variables.
Until somebody wins the Lottery (and I volunteer) and can put about half a million dollars and a year to test indoors; I'm still pretty much standing with Bartlein and Kreiger on the fluting issue.
I have a barrel on order with Bartlein, and it will be fluted.
This has been a good thread. I am going to one of AB's Seminars, and I intend to ask Brian about the fluting and see what he says these days.
Rich
if you had some serious illness, would you opt for a procedure that had this miniscule amount of testing?
There was no established criteria, and no real protocols for the testing. A one mile per hour wind would have moved the poi farther. And there is no real means of timing shots with the wind.
I do not know if you ever read Precision Shooting Magazine back in the old days. Merrill Martin was a wealthy man in the Bay area. Machinery Manufacturer. He had the only serious repeatable method of tuning in the wind I have ever seen or heard of in the early-mid nineties. He bought about a dozen weather stations, complete with wind vane system, and had them linked. It allowed him to test loads with a monitor readout that showed the wind direction and speed along the bullet flight path to 100 yards. It could show wind direction in degrees from 1-360 degrees, and mph in .1 increments.
The only other true testing was done about the same time, in the famous "Houston Warehouse". There, they only tested to see accuracy in a true Zero Condition.
The only valid comparison has to be done indoors, like they do at Picatinny Arsenal in their underground test facility. Otherwise there are too many unquantifiable variables.
Until somebody wins the Lottery (and I volunteer) and can put about half a million dollars and a year to test indoors; I'm still pretty much standing with Bartlein and Kreiger on the fluting issue.
I have a barrel on order with Bartlein, and it will be fluted.
This has been a good thread. I am going to one of AB's Seminars, and I intend to ask Brian about the fluting and see what he says these days.
Rich