Ned Ludd
Silver $$ Contributor
I hate to bring this up Ben but 1954 was the SECOND half of the last century. I was born in the FIRST half. Hope you're not having problems with Alzheimers yet..... Anyway I prefer Lapua also for its superior metallurgy/alloy.
Some people "age" at different rates. Apparently Ben was born in the first half of the last century solely based on his "apparent" age, a claim which is strongly supported by his recollection and use of numbers

As far as why people use Lapua brass, I had never used anything but Lapua brass until recently. I purchased 1000 pcs of virgin Lake City .223 Rem brass for a new F-TR competition rifle in which I planned shoot 90 VLDs. Pushing the 90s at 2850+ fps is pretty hard on brass and the LC brass has a reputation of having pretty hard caseheads and slightly greater case volume than Lapua; factors that should both work in favor of improving brass life with a relatively high pressure load. Long story short, the 1000 pcs of LC brass are still sitting in a box, and I am using Lapua brass in the new rifle. Frankly, the LC brass was good for little more IMO than plinking ammunition. The flash hole uniformity was non-existent, which is certain fixable with effort. However, the LC cases also had large amount of brass flashing on the inside of the case surrounding the flash hole. This material was semi-welded to the bottom of the case and extremely difficult to remove, one case at a time. I can only speak for myself, but I'm not going to use brass that has brass flashing "gravel" littered all over the bottom of the case. I'm also not going to dig that material out case by case. The flash holes and area inside the case on Lapua brass for me has always been pristine. There is a good reason why other brass costs less...and you typically get exactly what you pay for.
Last edited: