• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Opinions on McMillan F-Class Stock

Phil

Gold $$ Contributor
What are your guy`s opinions on the McMillan F-class stocks?????


Is this a decent alternative to a full blown PR&T stock, or not so much...........??????

Phil.
 
I'm pretty sure the McMillan F Class stock I use for .223 F/TR is stronger than the Boyd's laminated stock I use for 6mm BR F-Open class. So if you're gonna' use it to club a black bear to death, go with the McMillan.

But when it comes to shooting, the McMillan is NOT worth 6 times as much as my Boyd's, at least in my opinion. Plus, the McMillan took 18 times as long as the Boyd's to arrive at my house. So if you need a stock quickly, the Boyd's wins.

As far as I'm concerned, there is no functional difference between the two, so next time I build a competition gun, I'm going with another Boyd's. I'm pretty sure I've purchased my last McMillan. They aren't bad, but I don't see any reason to spend a lot of extra money and wait nearly forever to get one.

Incidentally, when it comes to shooting matches I usually finish higher with the gun equipped with the Boyd's stock; however, it's hard to say that the stock actually makes any difference. It's very much an apples/oranges comparison. Nevertheless, I certainly don't feel that I'm at a disadvantage on the firing line with my $109 Boyd's stock.
 
I'm pretty sure the McMillan F Class stock I use for .223 F/TR is stronger than the Boyd's laminated stock I use for 6mm BR F-Open class. So if you're gonna' use it to club a black bear to death, go with the McMillan.

But when it comes to shooting, the McMillan is NOT worth 6 times as much as my Boyd's, at least in my opinion. Plus, the McMillan took 18 times as long as the Boyd's to arrive at my house. So if you need a stock quickly, the Boyd's wins.

As far as I'm concerned, there is no functional difference between the two, so next time I build a competition gun, I'm going with another Boyd's. I'm pretty sure I've purchased my last McMillan. They aren't bad, but I don't see any reason to spend a lot of extra money and wait nearly forever to get one.

Incidentally, when it comes to shooting matches I usually finish higher with the gun equipped with the Boyd's stock; however, it's hard to say that the stock actually makes any difference. It's very much an apples/oranges comparison. Nevertheless, I certainly don't feel that I'm at a disadvantage on the firing line with my $109 Boyd's stock.
I pretty sure Phill is asking about a flat forend off a rest not a bipod.
 
i like mcmillan stocks better than i do kelblys. i feel like the mcmillan absorb vibrations better. i think its all in the fill inside the stock. kelblys are nice and stiff however and others feel this is an important feature
 
The kelby 1m is a better designed and built stock than a Mac. Fully enclosed and a secret inside that few know of at the early stages.
They are premier to work with also. Outstanding materials, design and workmanship.
It needs to fit you, that might be an issue, they dont have many ways to change the basic profile.
Tends to run a bit more compact.
You rarely get what you pay for these days, never more than you pay for. The Kelby is worth the $.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,969
Messages
2,206,810
Members
79,233
Latest member
Cheeapet
Back
Top