• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Expanding & turning arbors w/ 0.001" diff?

I have a 21st Century lathe. I'm getting inconsistent results. I though the issue was my stainless expander / turning arbor so I purchased his Titanium nitrite set hoping for tighter tolerances. There is 0.002" diff between the expander and the turning arbor. I can easily put the case on the cutter. To me, it seems like there is too much play which does not lead to consistency. Are there any sets with 0.001" difference? Am I barking up the wrong tree?
Perfect is Sinclair's at 1thou diff, and this is contingent on NEW brass (not fired).
Someone said the expander mandrel should be .0005 less than the turning mandrel. That's dead wrong, probably misspoken..
Are you measuring the mandrels themselves?
 
Perfect is Sinclair's at 1thou diff, and this is contingent on NEW brass (not fired).
Someone said the expander mandrel should be .0005 less than the turning mandrel. That's dead wrong, probably misspoken..

That would be me....yes...meant to imply 'greater' than the turning mandrel. I want a near interference fit when running the case mouth over the turning mandrel. Thanks for catching that Mike.
 
Just throwing this out there for anyone that may have interest. I have a local shop that will grind up mandrels in carbide in any diameter you want up to .375" for $40 ea. to fit the sinclair turning tools.
 
Huh. I've never had a problem. Just use some oil and they fit. Tightly, but they fit.
Having the brass fit tight over your turning mandrel is not as good idea as it seems. Yes, the tighter the fit, they are then not slopping and the cut seems like they would be more precise. The bad thing though is too tight a fit means they will generate more heat when you spin the brass, and warm brass expands and that in turn means you will have an inaccurate deeper cut than cooler brass.
 
It does heat up a little more, but you have to take the difference between the tool expansion and the brass expansion, and given the smallish increase in temperature, in practice I've not found the heat to be an issue. They all come out the same. Maybe I'm just lucky, but with a little lanolin and some care and they come out just fine without expanding. I probably wouldn't do it that way for large volume turning, but I've gotten good results doing a box at a time.
 
It does heat up a little more, but you have to take the difference between the tool expansion and the brass expansion, and given the smallish increase in temperature, in practice I've not found the heat to be an issue. They all come out the same. Maybe I'm just lucky, but with a little lanolin and some care and they come out just fine without expanding. I probably wouldn't do it that way for large volume turning, but I've gotten good results doing a box at a time.
I went so far as to use a lathe . Put and dialed in a pilot Used the tail stock to hold the case . They came out as good as I can meisure . The other I cut with a neck tuner . The Es were the same and no difference in groups. I think necks that are 0.001 is great .. Larry
 
I went so far as to use a lathe . Put and dialed in a pilot Used the tail stock to hold the case . They came out as good as I can meisure . The other I cut with a neck tuner . The Es were the same and no difference in groups. I think necks that are 0.001 is great .. Larry

My method is to turn a mandrel with my lathe and not remove it until done with cases. Mandrel has zero runout. Make mandrel for a light press fit for brass. Friction drives the case. I move cutter by hand to neck shoulder junction and then power feed/cut towards chuck. Never move the cross feed during the entire process. Makes neck turning fun. Well almost fun. Lol. :p:D:D

Paul

www.boltfluting.com
 
My method is to turn a mandrel with my lathe and not remove it until done with cases. Mandrel has zero runout. Make mandrel for a light press fit for brass. Friction drives the case. I move cutter by hand to neck shoulder junction and then power feed/cut towards chuck. Never move the cross feed during the entire process. Makes neck turning fun. Well almost fun. Lol. :p:D:D

Paul

www.boltfluting.com
Never is fun but sure makes the neck the same . Larry
 
I have a 21st Century lathe. I'm getting inconsistent results. I though the issue was my stainless expander / turning arbor so I purchased his Titanium nitrite set hoping for tighter tolerances. There is 0.002" diff between the expander and the turning arbor. I can easily put the case on the cutter. To me, it seems like there is too much play which does not lead to consistency. Are there any sets with 0.001" difference? Am I barking up the wrong tree?

Mooster1223,
Your problem is exactly what many of us have gone through. Many guys promise solutions but the reality is that most of the stuff they sell to us doesn't really do the job they claim to do. The tool you mentioned like many others. Just this week I had to pay my gunsmith to shave .040 off the bottom of two Redding dies that couldn't push back the shoulder of the brass because they bottomed out in both of my presses. Sorry, I digress.

The solution to your problem is a mandrel that will expand the necks to the exact amount to complement the mandrel of your turning tool. Here's where you can find the solution to your problem and more http://forum.accurateshooter.com/threads/the-ultimate-solution-to-neck-tension.3909740/

Regards,

Joe
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
164,921
Messages
2,186,714
Members
78,591
Latest member
Danpsl
Back
Top