• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Under Armor drops sponsership

UA has severed endorsement ties with much bigger fish than the "huntress". If the Bomar's wanted to continue to reap the benefits from the sponsorship contract, they would not have posted the video for the world to seeo_O:confused:
 
Last edited:
milo-2 said:
Who cares?
Click to expand...

This is part of the problem. Just because you don't care about the people and their bear hunt and loosing their sponsor because of anti hunter. We all have to stick together to support our rights.
I see this all the time. Hunters don't give a damn about us shooters wanting to use a m1 garand to shoot a match and shooters could care less about a hunter wanting to take a mountain lion in New Mexico. So neither of them support each other which is about supporting our rights. WE ALL NEED TO STICK TOGETHER TO PROTECT OUR RIGHTS.
 
jghoghunter said:
This is part of the problem. Just because you don't care about the people and their bear hunt and loosing their sponsor because of anti hunter. We all have to stick together to support our rights.
I see this all the time. Hunters don't give a damn about us shooters wanting to use a m1 garand to shoot a match and shooters could care less about a hunter wanting to take a mountain lion in New Mexico. So neither of them support each other which is about supporting our rights. WE ALL NEED TO STICK TOGETHER TO PROTECT OUR RIGHTS.
Click to expand...
NO, this has nothing to do with rights, it's about a sponsorship. I don't agree with any sponsorship, why should I pay more for ANY product so a person can have free undies or travel on UA's dime.
 
jghoghunter said:
This is part of the problem. Just because you don't care about the people and their bear hunt and loosing their sponsor because of anti hunter. We all have to stick together to support our rights.
Click to expand...
Their decision to post the video for the world to see cost them that sponsorship. Knowing how big the anti crowd is, they should have realized the anti groups, along with UA were going to see it. They have themselves to blame. 5 ill spoken words cost Manny Pacquiao $12 million per year in endorsements. He admitted he screwed-up.
 
Divide and conquer. Falling right in their trap as usual. This POS Pres. has been doing it for 8 long years.
Also I'm done posting on this here on this.
 
jghoghunter said:
This is part of the problem. Just because you don't care about the people and their bear hunt and loosing their sponsor because of anti hunter. We all have to stick together to support our rights.
I see this all the time. Hunters don't give a damn about us shooters wanting to use a m1 garand to shoot a match and shooters could care less about a hunter wanting to take a mountain lion in New Mexico. So neither of them support each other which is about supporting our rights. WE ALL NEED TO STICK TOGETHER TO PROTECT OUR RIGHTS.
Click to expand...
You are right we all need to stick together! But we wont, old school guys will question why anyone needs an AR15, The NRA will step in and defend certain peoples rights when gun issues hit the media and ignore it when it's others. We are the worst at looking past our own personal interests to sacrifice for the greater good.
 
I'm not falling into anyone's trap, just stated could give 2 craps if someone lost a sponsorship. Really tore me up the Olympic swimmer that had to fantasize about being robbed is losing his now too. Fight or our swimmers, worthy cause there!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JRS
dragman said:
You are right we all need to stick together! But we wont, old school guys will question why anyone needs an AR15, The NRA will step in and defend certain peoples rights when gun issues hit the media and ignore it when it's others. We are the worst at looking past our own personal interests to sacrifice for the greater good.
Click to expand...

How the hell does some girl losing her right to film her hubby while wearing under armour clothes turn into a gun rights issue?
I guess she can still wear her ua sports bra, but can't claim affiliation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JRS
You must log in or register to reply here.

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Classified Ads

Forum statistics

Threads
165,301
Messages
2,193,298
Members
78,819
Latest member
DJT

Share This Page

Back
Top