• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

2020 SWN Equipment List

Matthew Schwartzkopf

Attachments

  • 2020 SWN Equipment List action.png
    2020 SWN Equipment List action.png
    15.4 KB · Views: 1,954
  • 2020 SWN Equipment List barrel.png
    2020 SWN Equipment List barrel.png
    15.1 KB · Views: 1,912
  • 2020 SWN Equipment List bullet.png
    2020 SWN Equipment List bullet.png
    12.6 KB · Views: 1,824
  • 2020 SWN Equipment List scope.png
    2020 SWN Equipment List scope.png
    15.7 KB · Views: 1,817
  • 2020 SWN Equipment List stock.png
    2020 SWN Equipment List stock.png
    21.9 KB · Views: 1,758
Last edited by a moderator:
Given some of the discussions I've heard over the years, I would have expected way more Borden actions, a lot fewer Kelbly, and fewer BAT. Interesting!
 
milanuk said:
Given some of the discussions I've heard over the years, I would have expected way more Borden actions, a lot fewer Kelbly, and fewer BAT. Interesting!
Click to expand...
In general I would would tend to agree and perhaps all those with Pandas just aren’t as vocal as the others but there’s also only 231 who apparently completed the survey out of the (364?) competitors.

I’ll take a wild swing that if a)we had 100% participation in the survey and b)could compare that 100% survey participation to past years 100% survey participation, your assumption might probably be more correct. There’s also other factors such as sponsorships which may cause changes year to year too.

No matter what, I appreciate that Matt takes the time to circles back to collect and share the data. Not many other matches do so.
 
F Class John said:
In general I would would tend to agree and perhaps all those with Pandas just aren’t as vocal as the others but there’s also only 231 who apparently completed the survey out of the (364?) competitors.

I’ll take a wild swing that if a)we had 100% participation in the survey and b)could compare that 100% survey participation to past years 100% survey participation, your assumption might probably be more correct. There’s also other factors such as sponsorships which may cause changes year to year too.

No matter what, I appreciate that Matt takes the time to circles back to collect and share the data. Not many other matches do so.
Click to expand...

Then there are people like me that shoot a multitude of equipment. It makes it really hard to keep the information straight when I shoot different equipment from day to day.
 
I dont want this to come across the wrong way. But I do believe that sponsored shooters equipment should be noted somehow. Thats not to say theres anything wrong with sponsors or that those shooters would not buy the same parts at full retail. But since the whole point of equipment lists is to promote the best, I think its best to incentivize making the best not just spending the most in sponsorships. Not to say thats what is happening in F-class, but it is in other shooting disciplines.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Classified Ads

Forum statistics

Threads
164,919
Messages
2,186,693
Members
78,591
Latest member
Danpsl

Share This Page

Back
Top