• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Who's FPS Figures Can I Trust?

I have need to invest in a chronograph for meaningful load development of a .25 wildcat. I've read a number of reviews and have spoken to people who own at least four different models. Nothing I have read or have gleaned from owners gives me the confidence to say "I'll have a *^%$£*&^^* model# *&^%$ please".:confused:

At the risk of asking the unanswerable what do 6mmBR readers reckon I should go for? The only thing I'm really looking for in the machine is reliability of readings as in am I getting 3000fps or 2980fps. Please therefore don't further confuse me with comments such as "X model does this and that and is easily transported to the range" etc. Clearly it would be nice to plug it into my laptop for data storage and printing.:)

Thanks

Klenchblaize
 
KB -- longer screen spacing is needed for accuracy, the ohler35 is the best portable chrono IMO.

It is the best you will get without having a permanent setup with longer spacing,like 10 feet or more between screens)

I think the error on 1' spacers is about +- .5% = +-15fps at 3000fps

Good luck,
JB
 
I'm completely happy with my "Beta" model Shooting Chrony. I use it for load development. Once I'm happy with a load that shoots acurately with a low E.S. that's it.
Some of these guy's are obsessed with shooting over a chronograph everytime they go to the range. To each his own.

Myself I'd sooner spend more time competeing than obsessing over numbers on a little screen.
 
When Oehlers cost a lot of money,and were the only real units available), I built a ballistic chronograph as a project. It was actually surprisingly easy. A quartz crystal oscillator,I used 10 MHz), a high speed counter, and a Z-80 microprocessor to do the math.
The formula used for computing the velocity is v = l*f/c, were v is velocity in ft/s, l is the screen spacing, f is the oscillator frequency, and c is the number of counts obtained as the bullet travels between the screens.
There are a number of sources of measurement error.
The sensors have a small delay, but as long as both are the same the delay can be ignored since the start and stop signals will be delayed the same amount.
Another source of error is the screen spacing. Since the actual point in space that trips the screen is not really known, again making the screens as close to identical as possible is important, as well as measuring the spacing very accurately. The percent error on the spacing will be reflected directly in an error in the readings. A 1 foot spacing will need to be accurate to about 0.1% or so, or less than 1/64 of an inch. A 2 foot spacing better than 1/32 inch, a 4 foot 1/16 inch, etc. For a 1 % error the accuracy is 10 times less, allowing the 1 foot spacing to be within about 0.1 in.
The next source of error is the crystal frequency. This is very small since even inexpensive oscillators are within 100 PPM,including error and temperature changes). This is 0.01%. A 4000 ft/s reading will be in error 0.4 ft/s
The math required also produces a limit to the accuracy based on the crystal frequency. Time is divided into small periods, but only whole periods can be counted. Oehler uses a 4 MHz oscillator, for a period of 250 nanoseconds. Around 2000 ft/s each count starts to change the velocity by 1 ft/s. At 3000 ft/s, each count is worth about 2 ft/s, and at 4000 ft/s each count is up to ~4 ft/s. The only way to beat this problem is to use a larger spacing or a faster oscillator,or both).
With a 4 foot screen spacing and a 10 MHz oscillator the unit can be used up to ~6100 ft/s.
Oehler provides enough detailed information to allow a selection of spacing to get whatever accuracy is desired within the 4 MHz oscillator. Shooting Chrony claims around 0.5%, and PACT has no information at all.
Any are likely to produce useful data that is accurate enough to tell what is going on. Oehler allows the most manipulation with variable screen spacing.
 
Brickeyee is 100% correct. Error actually is acceptable so long as the error is consistent every time. Even an Oehler is going to be somewhat less than error free. Temp and humidity fluctuations will ever so slightly alter the spacing of the screens and therefore alter the output readings.

What kills your groups isn't that your bullets were traveling at 3302 instead of 3300. That likely wasn't a factor. More than likely there was an unacceptable error OR you used different equipment. Take 5 Oehler's,or 5 Chrony's) and shoot over them with the same loads and same rifle under the same conditions and you'll likely see discrepancies.

Whichever you use, use a single device for your load development and quality control. Use fresh batteries. I replace mine once a month whether it needs it or not. I favor my Chrony even though the Oehler has better features. It's handy, it's given me consistency, it was relatively inexpensive and it works. -Rod-
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,800
Messages
2,203,711
Members
79,130
Latest member
Jsawyer09
Back
Top