I looked at the cartridges recommended and am more clear on what my work best for me.
22BR: The 22BR is a 6mmBR case necked down for 22 bullets. The 6mmBR site says this. “The primary reason to shoot the 22BR vs. the 6BR is the extra velocity available from very light bullets. You can push the 52gr match bullets to 3700 fps and the 40gr Sierras and Noslers past 4000 fps. That kind of speed makes varminters smile--22-250 velocities with less powder and better accuracy. What's not to like?â€. I don’t hunt, and not sure what extra velocity is going to get me at 100 yards. I would expect reduced barrel life vs the 6mmBR and more susceptibility to wind.
30BR: This one was more recommended than anything else and the reasons for it doing so make sense. But, the more I think about it, I feel I may be put off by the recoil. I want to get a high score and tight groups, but I am a casual shooter and the fact that one slightly larger holes eeks itself into the X ring is not that important.
308: Call me a wimp, but while I can handle the 308 recoil, why should I? Longer barrel life is one reason, but every one of those many thousands of rounds is punching me harder than I personally care for. A muzzle brake can help, but then more noise.
260 Remington: One person suggested the 260 Remington, but its strength is way beyond even my longest distance of 300 yards, and while recoil is less than the 308, so is barrel life.
6.5 x 47: One person mentioned the 6.5 x 47. I don’t know why, but I have a soft spot for this one. It can also run through a magazine if I decide to use that, which I know rules out some others here.
6PPC: It was mentioned that prepped brass can be purchased and while I don’t mind doing a fair amount of brass prep, it does seem that this cartridge requires a fair amount of work. I also honestly have to wonder if it is just too specialized.
222: I could not find much about this, other than sort of a faster 223 with higher velocity.
223AI: I question whether the extra velocity will be of much benefit for my shooting distances. The extra powder won’t help barrel life.
223 Remington: I have no real complaint with this cartridge, the one I have. I just wanted something different and with potentially higher accuracy.
6mmBR: This one appears very hard to beat. Recoil = low to modest. Accuracy pretty much second, but close to the 6PPC. Easy to load for. Minimal brass preparation. I expect I can get very good accuracy out of standard Lapua brass, not wasting barrel life on fire-forming rounds. Barrel life is the only downside, but not that bad. Will work well at pretty much any distance I can access while giving up little. Can't use a magazine without some work, that may not even be that reliable, but for now, am fine loading one round at a time at the local range.
Phil
22BR: The 22BR is a 6mmBR case necked down for 22 bullets. The 6mmBR site says this. “The primary reason to shoot the 22BR vs. the 6BR is the extra velocity available from very light bullets. You can push the 52gr match bullets to 3700 fps and the 40gr Sierras and Noslers past 4000 fps. That kind of speed makes varminters smile--22-250 velocities with less powder and better accuracy. What's not to like?â€. I don’t hunt, and not sure what extra velocity is going to get me at 100 yards. I would expect reduced barrel life vs the 6mmBR and more susceptibility to wind.
30BR: This one was more recommended than anything else and the reasons for it doing so make sense. But, the more I think about it, I feel I may be put off by the recoil. I want to get a high score and tight groups, but I am a casual shooter and the fact that one slightly larger holes eeks itself into the X ring is not that important.
308: Call me a wimp, but while I can handle the 308 recoil, why should I? Longer barrel life is one reason, but every one of those many thousands of rounds is punching me harder than I personally care for. A muzzle brake can help, but then more noise.
260 Remington: One person suggested the 260 Remington, but its strength is way beyond even my longest distance of 300 yards, and while recoil is less than the 308, so is barrel life.
6.5 x 47: One person mentioned the 6.5 x 47. I don’t know why, but I have a soft spot for this one. It can also run through a magazine if I decide to use that, which I know rules out some others here.
6PPC: It was mentioned that prepped brass can be purchased and while I don’t mind doing a fair amount of brass prep, it does seem that this cartridge requires a fair amount of work. I also honestly have to wonder if it is just too specialized.
222: I could not find much about this, other than sort of a faster 223 with higher velocity.
223AI: I question whether the extra velocity will be of much benefit for my shooting distances. The extra powder won’t help barrel life.
223 Remington: I have no real complaint with this cartridge, the one I have. I just wanted something different and with potentially higher accuracy.
6mmBR: This one appears very hard to beat. Recoil = low to modest. Accuracy pretty much second, but close to the 6PPC. Easy to load for. Minimal brass preparation. I expect I can get very good accuracy out of standard Lapua brass, not wasting barrel life on fire-forming rounds. Barrel life is the only downside, but not that bad. Will work well at pretty much any distance I can access while giving up little. Can't use a magazine without some work, that may not even be that reliable, but for now, am fine loading one round at a time at the local range.
Phil