• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Which 4198 are they recommending?

pertnear

Silver $$ Contributor
I just started reloading the .256 Win Mag (rifle) & there doesn't seem to be much "new" loading data around. No problem though, I just went back to my library of trusty old reloading manuals for help. They all seem to recommend 4198. What is that - H4198 or IMR4198? With a little research I did discover they both have different burning rates, along with a stern warning. If I'm starting with minimum loads in this small capacity cartridge, am I making a mountain out of a mole hill? I have both powders but A LOT more IMR than H.

TIA...

BTW: If you have a good .256 WM load or two to share, that'd be good too!
 
I have been fooling with 4198 for quite a few years in my 30BR.

Up until about 8 years ago, most of the H 4198 was black. After that, i think right around the time they started putting that Extreme logo on the jug, it all had the greenish is color it has now. Both shot equally well.

IMR never seemed shot as well in my 30BR. Years ago, I borrowed some from a fellow shooter. But then he had no idea how old it was.
 
IMR was what used to be used. I don't know what year Hodgdon started selling 4198. I would go with a starting load of IMR and go from there. IMR seems to have fallen out of favor in the last 10 years or so but I really don't know why. They are all owned by the same people now so what difference does it make?
That guy is right when he says hodgdon never made powder, the history is right in their manuals. The old man (Bruce) resold military powders to start with then started importing it to cover the numbers as needed. Good reading, especially if you like a little history about our sport. Gary
 
Hodgdon's #27 Data Manual only has data for H4198 for both rifle and pistol, this was the last book they published that had other powder company products. Hornady &th Edition only shows H4198 for 87gr jacketed bullets. Lee's 2nd Edition, 2011 reprint, only shows H4198, the same data as Hodgdon #27.
 
The 256 is a fun little round, used it 40 yrs ago in T/C 10" bbl for IHMSA shooting. Started with IMR 4198 & 87 gr. bullets, but case got full (compressed load) before maxing out. Went to RL 7 or WW680 for better results in shorter bbl from the Lyman data.
Newer powders, not much info, as the 256 is considered obsolete. Lyman 45th has data for both rifle and pistol with usable powders at the time, same with Hornady, and they will work good. Since you say you have lots of 4198, go for it.
If you are using in a Marlin M62 rifle, a friend had one but it had a large chamber like the T/C and brass was really worked when resized. Not good for brass life. Something to pay attention to.
 
General rule of thumb: if a recipe for an older round calls for a powder with both IMR and H versions, it means the IMR version. H versions of the powders are generally much newer formulations that didn’t exist when old data was published.
 
Try both at a safe starting load. When working with a 6.5-284 I tried IMR4831 and H 4831 and the IMR shot better with some bullets. H4831 shot better with others.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,265
Messages
2,215,477
Members
79,508
Latest member
Jsm4425
Back
Top