Don't really see how it could be any better. The 260AI is fast, accurate, and requires little to no trimming and if the F/L brass re-sizing is kept in check @ .002 or less shoulder bump it will last a very long time.Is there any advantage of a 260 improved 30 over a 260AI?
Disadvantage of being more difficult to procure dies. (Bump for Dave Tooley’s post above)Is there any advantage of a 260 improved 30 over a 260AI?
Please explain more, as this will be a bolt gun for hunting primarily. Is 30 vs 40 degree angle something I should not think about as far as feeding?Less applicable to bolt actions
Are you asking about the 6.5 SLR?...Does anyone know if any information still exists on the 260 improved 30 that used to be developed by Robert Whitley? I remember reading about it years ago and liking the concept...but it seems all those articles are gone now. Is this an option for a build anymore?
If both versions have an improved cases body with the same amount of body taper reduction, the 10* difference in shoulder won’t matter in a bolt action. The cycling rate of a human behind the bolt won’t induce failures, so much as the shooter failing to perform a complete rearward travel of the bolt. 260AI, 257 RobAI, 280 RemAI, etc. all traditionally use a 40* shoulder with much success.Please explain more, as this will be a bolt gun for hunting primarily. Is 30 vs 40 degree angle something I should not think about as far as feeding?
Nope, the 260 improved 30. It was another design by the same person that made the 6.5 SLR.Are you asking about the 6.5 SLR?...
There is a good node @ 2900 fps with the 140 class bullets that works really good in my 260AI sThe 260AI also has enough horse power to push the heavies. I'm shooting the 153.5 in mine for f/open, low node at 2780 in a 29" Kreiger helps with barrel life. I ran 140s at 2975 with success.