• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

What do I need to buy to use Mandrels.

I would like to give using mandrels a try for setting consistent neck tension and making my case necks as concentric as possible and keeping run out to a bare minimum, but not at all sure how to determine what size mandrels I need to buy. I would be doing this for my Tikka T3 Lite in 300wsm, my Savage 308 FCP, and lastly my rifles in 35 Remington as I hunt with or shoot these rifles most often. Are I correct that mandrels are sized by caliber and not cartridge, or in other words a .308 mandrel will work for most 308 caliber cartridges?

I will also need to confirm if I am correct in assuming this is one of the proper methods of using a mandrel is to first after removing the de-capping pin and expander from my Redding FL resizing dies, full length resize my brass then use the mandrel to enlarge the case neck and set my desired case neck tension.

Lastly for factory rifles chambered for standardized cartridges like the ones I have listed what is considered the preferred amount of neck tension? I'm guessing somewhere between 0.00150 and 0.002" of neck tension.
 
I use these and have not been disappointed:

http://www.xxicsi.com/caliber-specific-expander-mandrels.html

http://www.xxicsi.com/expander-die-body.html

These mandrels will also fit in the Sinclair Gen II Die body:

https://www.sinclairintl.com/reload...ls/generation-ii-expander-dies-prod38807.aspx


In my hands, a mandrel that is .0015" under bullet diameter will give neck tension (interference fit) of very close to .0020", presumably due to springback. Obviously, you need to use a bushing first that will size the necks slightly smaller (.001" to .002") than the mandrel, in order for the mandrel to work effectively.
 
Last edited:
Well I went the cheap route I use pin gages from Suncoast Tools and a Forester Bullet puller get the -minus gages less than $3.00 each.
 
Obviously, you need to use a bushing first that will size the necks slightly smaller (.001" to .002") than the mandrel, in order for the mandrel to work effectively.

Am I understanding you correctly that my FL resizing die minus the expander will not do this I will need to buy a bushing resizing die, or will my standard Redding FL sizing die minus the expander work well enough?
 
I have the porter precision setup and the pins are around $3. Takes less than a minute to spin em against a grinding wheel. It doesnt have to be perfect
 
Obviously, you need to use a bushing first that will size the necks slightly smaller (.001" to .002") than the mandrel, in order for the mandrel to work effectively.

Am I understanding you correctly that my FL resizing die minus the expander will not do this I will need to buy a bushing resizing die, or will my standard Redding FL sizing die minus the expander work well enough?
You are correct, you can use your FL die to size neck, if you take out the expander ball. The only con is your die neck may reduce the brass neck excessively, resulting in more pressure needed to expand with your mandrel.
 
I guess I'm missing something here, but what advantage does using a mandrel this way have over first turning your necks and then using a bushing die with the bushing chosen to give you the tension you want?
 
Mandrels are readily available in half thou or finer increments, and is imo easier than neck turning.
 
I guess I'm missing something here, but what advantage does using a mandrel this way have over first turning your necks and then using a bushing die with the bushing chosen to give you the tension you want?
I have tried both ways, both will work. That said, I have drifted entirely to using the mandrels to set final "grip".

Though I turn all my brass, I do get a slight improvement on paper with the mandrel. Actually, a better description is my POI is more consistent.

My thought is that the difference is springback is outward with the bushing and inward using a mandrel. And no, I can't prove that is why I shoot tighter groups using the mandrel.

Another mandrel advantage is that it's sizing the entire neck, therefore pushing all variance to the outside. If shoulder is encroaching the neck, it's easier to control a donut by outside turning again. Just my experience.
 
I have the Porter, it’s a great set up. Taper the pin just like Dusty said.
 
I use these and have not been disappointed:

http://www.xxicsi.com/caliber-specific-expander-mandrels.html

http://www.xxicsi.com/expander-die-body.html

These mandrels will also fit in the Sinclair Gen II Die body:

https://www.sinclairintl.com/reload...ls/generation-ii-expander-dies-prod38807.aspx


In my hands, a mandrel that is .0015" under bullet diameter will give neck tension (interference fit) of very close to .0020", presumably due to springback. Obviously, you need to use a bushing first that will size the necks slightly smaller (.001" to .002") than the mandrel, in order for the mandrel to work effectively.
+1 on 21st mandrels. Zero complaints.
 
Obviously, you need to use a bushing first that will size the necks slightly smaller (.001" to .002") than the mandrel, in order for the mandrel to work effectively.

Am I understanding you correctly that my FL resizing die minus the expander will not do this I will need to buy a bushing resizing die, or will my standard Redding FL sizing die minus the expander work well enough?

I only use bushing dies and/or mandrels. I remove the expander ball from every bushing die I own. IMO - they're not worth the trouble.

How does your FL resizing die size the necks in terms of the final [desired] neck tension/interference fit? My point was simply that if you're going to use a mandrel as the final sizing step, it is preferable to have sized the necks slightly smaller in the previous step so that the mandrel can open up all the necks efficiently and consistently. If the previous re-sizing step leaves the necks very, very close in size to what the chosen mandrel diameter is expected to leave them, I am not sure it will work as consistently. It might, but I don't do it that way, so I can't say for sure.

I prefer to have the mandrel opening up the neck by at least .001" or .002" from the previous step, rather than just barely opening them up from the previous step. I believe the results are more consistent that way. If your FL die without the expander sizes the necks down at least .001" below what you expect from the final step with the mandrel, it should work fine.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,280
Messages
2,214,943
Members
79,496
Latest member
Bie
Back
Top