After recognizing that top accuracy and convenience of light portable equipment (i.e., bipod) are at odds with another for mere mortals like me, I have decided to look into a mechanical front rest (accuracy over convenience). I prefer the co-axials, but all that I see are very expensive. SEB is a year out from what I hear and costly, Farley is pricey, and even buying a top to add to a base is hardly a modest cost. Caldwells Fire Control is often slammed for poor quality, but it is just $220. I don't compete, I shoot ARs and a factory gun, with the most accurate rifle to be a 6mmBR custom, all at paper targets at 100 yards, 200 rarely. An $800 rest seems like overkill. Maybe a cheaper non-coaxial is all I need, but how do you go about adjusting point of aim? Windage and elevation screws each time?
I want to "drive" the rifle, and aim it, hang onto it. I shot a 65 lb. unlimited bench gun at 1000 yards in a BenchRest competition and it was not my cup of tea. No shot feedback until after the competition, I did not care for the free recoil style, and never really got to aim the rifle during the event, only waiting for winds to mimic the winds we tested in earlier. Nor did I have to concern myself with the 103 degree mirage since the gun was sighted in and unmoved since the morning shots with no mirage. Reading winds is very hard, but overall, not the kind of shooting I want to do.
So, if a non-coaxial fits my needs, Hart and Sinclair look good. But at a loss with coaxials.
Phil
I want to "drive" the rifle, and aim it, hang onto it. I shot a 65 lb. unlimited bench gun at 1000 yards in a BenchRest competition and it was not my cup of tea. No shot feedback until after the competition, I did not care for the free recoil style, and never really got to aim the rifle during the event, only waiting for winds to mimic the winds we tested in earlier. Nor did I have to concern myself with the 103 degree mirage since the gun was sighted in and unmoved since the morning shots with no mirage. Reading winds is very hard, but overall, not the kind of shooting I want to do.
So, if a non-coaxial fits my needs, Hart and Sinclair look good. But at a loss with coaxials.
Phil