• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Unertl or Lyman or...

There seem to have been four major scope makers back in the day of the external adjustable scopes...Unertl, Lyman, Fecker and Litschert.

Any consensus as to which was the best?
 
Based upon popularity, expense, and longevity of staying business for optics, my vote would be Unertl first, with Lyman a distant second, and the others would be honorable mention. It is hard not to love the externally adjustable Unertls and Lymans.
 
Interesting you only list the top four but there were several others that deserve honorable mention. Two who I think were definite leaders the Edwards co. and Bausch & Lomb. Then there were others like Mossberg, Marlin, Malcom, Winchester, Remington, Stevens, and Belding & Mull. No doubt that Unertl with it's military contracts overshadowed the competition with popularity. My pick as the top four: Unertl, followed by Fecker, Litschert, and Bausch & Lomb. Interesting to note that Edwards and Litschert were both of Indiana. Good topic but not for classifieds.
 
Last edited:
The mounts mean as much or more than the glass of an externally adjusted scope. Tasco made a knock off of the Bausch & Lomb in the 60’s that was possibly a better scope, but the mounts were terrible.

Redfield is also under rated and one not mentioned yet that is arguably better than Unertl is a Mitchell.

The other thing to remember is you’re talking about 40-100 year old glass, I have seen a number of Litschert scopes that are about half the price of a Unertl, but due to care, are a much better scope to buy and use.

Fecker has a unique parallax adjustment that I appreciate and all things being the same, would buy one over a Unertl of the same power, tube and objective diameters.

Many things to consider shopping old target scopes.
 
I’ve looked through a lot of the scopes mentioned and IMHO the Bausch and Lomb Balvar has some of the Sharpest Optics and
has an advantage of being Variable. Followed by the Unertl being a close second.
 
Unertl, Lyman 2nd.
I have to agree. Both are, optically, kissing cousins. The adjustment of focus on the unertl imo is easier than the Lyman STS. I have both and use both but my nod slightly has to go to Unertl. You can't go wrong with either in the end, imo.
 
Last edited:
The mounts mean as much or more than the glass of an externally adjusted scope. Tasco made a knock off of the Bausch & Lomb in the 60’s that was possibly a better scope, but the mounts were terrible.

Redfield is also under rated and one not mentioned yet that is arguably better than Unertl is a Mitchell.

The other thing to remember is you’re talking about 40-100 year old glass, I have seen a number of Litschert scopes that are about half the price of a Unertl, but due to care, are a much better scope to buy and use.

Fecker has a unique parallax adjustment that I appreciate and all things being the same, would buy one over a Unertl of the same power, tube and objective diameters.

Many things to consider shopping old target scopes.
The B&L BalVar scope is a nice optical unit but the rear mount is simply a rube goldberg affair and if it goes bonkers on you good luck getting it fixed. It was so prone to trouble that years ago Kuharsky made a unertl like rear mount for it. Today, you can get an excellent unertl style rear mount for the B&L BalVar 6-24X from Steve Earle products.
 
The B&L BalVar scope is a nice optical unit but the rear mount is simply a rube goldberg affair and if it goes bonkers on you good luck getting it fixed. It was so prone to trouble that years ago Kuharsky made a unertl like rear mount for it. Today, you can get an excellent unertl style rear mount for the B&L BalVar 6-24X from Steve Earle products.
A couple others who also make scopes for those who may not be familiar

DZ arms reproduction scopes and mounts

Montana Vintage arms makes quality scopes and mounts in Unertl, Malocolm and Winchester styles.

Just hard to get a tube over 3/4" or a scope over 10X. The mounts are better than almost all of the originals.
 
If your thinking about buying one it’s best to look through them if you haven’t already. Many of the smaller tubes have a very small field of view, eye relief can be tight and on higher powered ones the parallax adjustment is critical for focus. I will say the glass on my 25x and 30x Unertl’s is excellent. They are classic and cool looking but modern glass is much more user friendly.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,965
Messages
2,207,153
Members
79,237
Latest member
claydunbar
Back
Top