• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Turbulent boundary layer on bullet

Ive just watched the podcast from Vortex and Ian Klemm.
Really interesting and in the video Ian talks about a die that scores the jacket just forward of the meplat creating a turbulent boundary layer on the bullet.

Does anyone know anything about this die?
 
David Tubb talks about it in this youtube video.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
i thought the main idea behind this was to "smooth" the transition from supersonic to subsonic flight. Meaning its more for the ELR guys.
 
Smooth doesn't always have the lowest drag coefficient. Golf balls are dimpled to create a turbulent boundary layer, reduce drag and make them go farther. As I recall from fluids in college (many years ago.....), what surface type has the lowest drag depends on velocity, shape and perhaps other things. I reserve the right to be amazed later, but I wouldn't expect it to make a consistent, overall improvement in bc over the velocity ranges they see in long range shooting. If they do improve bc I would think it would be over a relatively narrow velocity range. And then, the surface changes could decrease the bc over the rest of the range. Getting a net-positive gain seems unlikely to me. But as I said, I reserve the right to be amazed........
 
What I'm hearing Mr. Tubb say is that there will be more consistency to a given lot of bullets. He also states that groups can be cut in half and that you can see the effect at even a 100 yards.
 
Smooth doesn't always have the lowest drag coefficient. Golf balls are dimpled to create a turbulent boundary layer, reduce drag and make them go farther. As I recall from fluids in college (many years ago.....), what surface type has the lowest drag depends on velocity, shape and perhaps other things. I reserve the right to be amazed later, but I wouldn't expect it to make a consistent, overall improvement in bc over the velocity ranges they see in long range shooting. If they do improve bc I would think it would be over a relatively narrow velocity range. And then, the surface changes could decrease the bc over the rest of the range. Getting a net-positive gain seems unlikely to me. But as I said, I reserve the right to be amazed........


had some Bart’s ultra that sat in the boxes in a very heavy gun safe for a decade in the basement about 40 feet from a water sistrin

when opened they were mottled and sold them for a loss

they were,manic bullets. just like the golf ball as a car wind tunnel guy told me it broke up the air
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
170,034
Messages
2,285,937
Members
82,482
Latest member
Lch72
Back
Top