• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

This guy blows up his 50 BMG!

I can’t see those pipe threads withstanding as much pressure as a more conventional bolt design. I’d be t a conventional bolt action wouldn’t have let go.
John
This is the conversation I've been having with myself for a couple days. Modes of failure? A savage 338lm was shot with a cleaning rod still in the bore. It split the action at the tennon threads and spit out the barrel. The bolt lugs and action lugs held the line, putting the majority of the force forward.

With this action design, the weakest part came back at the shooter. Scary shit. 200-220grs of powder, a lot of energy.
 
No way threads like that are as strong as lugs on a bolt.I read that a Rem. 700 action will hold over 100,000 psi.85,000 isn't much over the 65,000 that a lot of cartridges operate at.
 
This is the conversation I've been having with myself for a couple days. Modes of failure? A savage 338lm was shot with a cleaning rod still in the bore. It split the action at the tennon threads and spit out the barrel. The bolt lugs and action lugs held the line, putting the majority of the force forward.

With this action design, the weakest part came back at the shooter. Scary shit. 200-220grs of powder, a lot of energy.
Thrust is calculated with the diameter of the internal case as a factor. I'd bet on a smaller case with equal pressure having lots less damage at that pressure...but I'm not so sure I'd want to be the one proving it either way. :)
 

This is the 338 I brought up earlier. This story has me checking my bore at the start of every range trip. A 338lm has half the powder, and less bolt thrust as noted above.


Edit.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
Things are not what they seem. The breach expands on each firing causing wear on the threads holding the cap in place. Fire enough rounds and there will be wear on the loose fitting, hand tightened threads. The threads are the weak link. Instead of spitting the barrel out of an action the cap was ejected away from the barrel towards the shooter.
 
I posted this in the other thread but want to repeat it here:

I think far more important than outright strength is designing for graceful failure. Modern bolt actions, defined as anything from the 20th century on, all have ways of handling and diverting gas from a case rupture or bore obstruction away from the shooter. This rifle design has no such facility and has now very publicly demonstrated why it is incredibly important to address and design for what happens WHEN (not if) a bore obstruction, high pressure, case rupture, etc. type event happens.
 
Part of the issue, IMO, is the lack of any secondary safety feature should the threads that secured the cap fail...which they did. The only pressure relief is the cap, which by its position would come straight back to the shooter. He is ONE VERY LUCKY SHOOTER!!!
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
169,983
Messages
2,285,178
Members
82,447
Latest member
gabernathy
Back
Top