• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

swift improved

Bill, the 22-250 has an increase of .040" dia at the shoulder body junction leaving .014" taper.
it gains 10% water volume

The 220 swift has a .402 shoulder dia, and body,base dia of .445, thus you would be limited to an expansion of no more than .028 atthe shoulder/body junction plus the 40degree,

i would estimate that you gain no more than 6-7%, not bad but notas much as 22-250 which should exceed out put of the 220 AI with same weight bullets, etc

THey are so close together anyway and the22-250 is easier to get brass, and shoot.


Bob
 
Hi WBoggs,

With mine I gained just under 10%. Original loads were 44.1gr of N160, with new Kreiger barrel chambered in 220 Swift AI with the 40 degree shoulder I load at 48gr of N160 this is wth a 52gr Barts bullet.
Velocity is a shade over 4000 fps, with no pressure signs, accuracy is fantastic, I'm sure it is capable of a few more fps but why spoil a good thing :D

Regards
Steve
 
This cartridge is a great setup with a fast twist and a 75 A-max. This will launch rockchucks into outer space. 8) Paul.

www.boltfluting.com
 
According to Handloader~s Manual for Cartridge Conversions the 220 Swift has a case capicity of 2.99 cc and the improved has a capicity of 3.07 cc.
 
An article in the recent Varmint Hunter magazine comparing overbore 224 cartridges shows:
22-250AI=46.9 grains of water
22-243=50 grains
22CHeetah=54or56(2 different shoulder angles)
220SwiftAI=57 grains
22Clark(6mmRem case)=59 grains

No way is the 22-250AI even close, in fact it won't equall a standard Swift. The 220Swift case is without question much stronger built in the base and web area. I get sick and tired of hearing 22-250 guys trying to justify their inferior choice.

With that off my chest, I'll share my experience of shooting tens of thousands of rounds with both 220 and 220AI over 50plus years.
I don't believe the additional powder capacity of the improved version makes a significant improvement with a 1:14 twist barrel and 40 to 55gr bullets. I use mostly IMR4064 and H414 powders and prefer the 55gr Nosler b-tips, but I have used more than a few 50gr and some 40gr bullets. A couple grains of powder in the larger case does nothing for velocity and 3 to 4 grains more shows significant pressure increases with the modest velocity gains.
There are some much better performance gains with the 220AI when going to a 1:9 twist and shooting 69-80gr bullets. 200-300 fps more velocity using a few grains more of the slower burning powders really makes a difference down range a far targets.
Another benefit of the 220AI case is that the need to trim the brass seems to be much less than the standard Swift cases.
One other observation on the 220AI case is that they are a bit harder to reload as far as resizing. Too light with the lube and they stick real easy because the cases are so straight walled. A little too much lube makes for big ugly lube dents on the shoulders.

P.S. Before anybody jumps my comparison of the 220 vs. 22-250, I have also fired tens of thousands of rounds in the 22-250 as well. I love the cartridge. It just ain't a Swift!
 
Thanks for the information on the case capacities of different cartridges and the feedback from someone who has experiences of SHOOTING the cartridges in question.

Hal
 
I'm glad someone finally stepped up and stated fact instead of a pipe dream.
The 22-250 and it's AI brother are darn fine cartridges...but they ain't a swift, just like a 308 isn't a 30-06.

Hotshot said:
An article in the recent Varmint Hunter magazine comparing overbore 224 cartridges shows:
22-250AI=46.9 grains of water
22-243=50 grains
22CHeetah=54or56(2 different shoulder angles)
220SwiftAI=57 grains
22Clark(6mmRem case)=59 grains

No way is the 22-250AI even close, in fact it won't equall a standard Swift. The 220Swift case is without question much stronger built in the base and web area. I get sick and tired of hearing 22-250 guys trying to justify their inferior choice.
With that off my chest, I'll share my experience of shooting tens of thousands of rounds with both 220 and 220AI over 50plus years.
I don't believe the additional powder capacity of the improved version makes a significant improvement with a 1:14 twist barrel and 40 to 55gr bullets. I use mostly IMR4064 and H414 powders and prefer the 55gr Nosler b-tips, but I have used more than a few 50gr and some 40gr bullets. A couple grains of powder in the larger case does nothing for velocity and 3 to 4 grains more shows significant pressure increases with the modest velocity gains.
There are some much better performance gains with the 220AI when going to a 1:9 twist and shooting 69-80gr bullets. 200-300 fps more velocity using a few grains more of the slower burning powders really makes a difference down range a far targets.
Another benefit of the 220AI case is that the need to trim the brass seems to be much less than the standard Swift cases.
One other observation on the 220AI case is that they are a bit harder to reload as far as resizing. Too light with the lube and they stick real easy because the cases are so straight walled. A little too much lube makes for big ugly lube dents on the shoulders.

P.S. Before anybody jumps my comparison of the 220 vs. 22-250, I have also fired tens of thousands of rounds in the 22-250 as well. I love the cartridge. It just ain't a Swift!
 
And the .220 Weatherby Rocket holds 52.5 grains of water in Norma brass. Good post Hotshot! My sentiments exactly!

Frank
 
357,
That's a good question, but I'm not good at keeping such records. I have two 220Swifts and in the past have had three or more at any given time. My passion is prairie dog shooting and I have in excess of 2000 brass(Win). I load all the empties every winter, then shoot as many as I can during the spring and summer. I mark an X on the load info tag everytime I load a box and some have 8 or 9 X's, most only have 3-5. I don't really have many cases fail. An occasional cracked neck or loose primer pocket gets tossed in the can. I can say the same for 6 other cartridges that I use.
Since I discovered the 204Ruger a few years ago they do most of the work for me now. The fast twist Swift is good for showing off at longer ranges and fighting stiff winds, but I don't care for all the barrel cleaning and cool down time compared to the 20cals.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,985
Messages
2,207,908
Members
79,278
Latest member
MBRAD
Back
Top