Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hotshot said:An article in the recent Varmint Hunter magazine comparing overbore 224 cartridges shows:
22-250AI=46.9 grains of water
22-243=50 grains
22CHeetah=54or56(2 different shoulder angles)
220SwiftAI=57 grains
22Clark(6mmRem case)=59 grains
No way is the 22-250AI even close, in fact it won't equall a standard Swift. The 220Swift case is without question much stronger built in the base and web area. I get sick and tired of hearing 22-250 guys trying to justify their inferior choice.
With that off my chest, I'll share my experience of shooting tens of thousands of rounds with both 220 and 220AI over 50plus years.
I don't believe the additional powder capacity of the improved version makes a significant improvement with a 1:14 twist barrel and 40 to 55gr bullets. I use mostly IMR4064 and H414 powders and prefer the 55gr Nosler b-tips, but I have used more than a few 50gr and some 40gr bullets. A couple grains of powder in the larger case does nothing for velocity and 3 to 4 grains more shows significant pressure increases with the modest velocity gains.
There are some much better performance gains with the 220AI when going to a 1:9 twist and shooting 69-80gr bullets. 200-300 fps more velocity using a few grains more of the slower burning powders really makes a difference down range a far targets.
Another benefit of the 220AI case is that the need to trim the brass seems to be much less than the standard Swift cases.
One other observation on the 220AI case is that they are a bit harder to reload as far as resizing. Too light with the lube and they stick real easy because the cases are so straight walled. A little too much lube makes for big ugly lube dents on the shoulders.
P.S. Before anybody jumps my comparison of the 220 vs. 22-250, I have also fired tens of thousands of rounds in the 22-250 as well. I love the cartridge. It just ain't a Swift!