A couple of years ago I bought a 45ACP gauge with the view slot from Sheridan. I used it load a couple of hundred rounds. I should have checked before loading so many. My Sig 1911 would not cycle. I then disassembled the Sig and did the plunk test. The rounds did not chamber properly. After pulling the rounds apart, I reloaded using the barrel as a gauge and now had good rounds. I contacted Sheridan explained the problem but finally, even after sending them dummy rounds, I had to return the gauge. Fast forward two years. I bought an EGW 4 caliber gauge ( which uses Clymer reamers ) for my 9mm reloads, it also had a 45ACP hole. I dug up a few rounds I had saved that did not chamber with the Sig but passed the Sheridan gauge. The EGW rejected the bad rounds, it also passed my good rounds. I milled the same view slot in the 45ACP hole as the Sheridan used. I was curious as to the difference in gauges. The EGW gauge had a nice sharp transition edge between the case and the bullet, the Sheridan did not, leaving a sloppy seating test. I contacted Sheridan to update them now that I had a known working gauge for comparison. I was told two things: Sheridans lawyer said I could not tell anyone I milled a slot to find the problem or even use the milled gauge, and I was told that the fault was mine, the way I reloaded was the problem. The EGW for $22 is on Amazon. It is a really accurate gauge the does 4 calibers.