• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Scope ring questions?

Klong

Gold $$ Contributor
I was at the range yesterday and a shooter was swapping rings from steel to aluminum and back on a couple of his rifles. He later showed me his targets and the steel rings shot better on both rifles. He used the same loads and same scope and shot 5 shot groups. The steel ring groups were about half the size of the aluminum ring groups.

Anyone ever done this? What was your results?

Thanks, Ken
 
No, it'd be interesting to see if the quality/design of the two different materials were on par with each other to see how scientific of a test it was - comparing top of the line steel rings to say some aluminum Tasco rings for an air rifle might be a little misleading.

I run Burris Signature Zee rings on everything; I'm sold on them and it'll be a hard sell getting me to switch to something else because of their holding power, ability to zero and dial in MOA with the inserts and the fact you can't tell a scope's been mounted with them - no marring.

Wayne
 
Ditto for the Burris Signature Zee rings, the only kind I use since they came on the market. My heaviest "kicker" is a 308 and I've never seen any evidence of quality rings ( not some "made-in-c****" crap) having any effect on point-of-impact changes or group sizes.
 
steel rings are more accurate than aluminum?

Klong said:
I was at the range yesterday and a shooter was swapping rings from steel to aluminum and back on a couple of his rifles. He later showed me his targets and the steel rings shot better on both rifles. He used the same loads and same scope and shot 5 shot groups. The steel ring groups were about half the size of the aluminum ring groups.

BS detector on high alert.

May as well say he shot better with wool socks instead of nylon.
 
WELL SURE, EVERYBODY KNOWS YOU SHOOT BETTER IN WOOL SOCKS!!!

THEY KEEP YOUR FEET WARM.

MERRY CHRISTMAS

RON
 
Proper mounting of a scope (except when using Burris Signature rings, with the plastic inserts) requires that the rings be lapped, and the alignment of the lapping may be lost if the lower half of either ring is removed from its base. Combine this with the fact that the most accurate rifles in the world us aluminum rings, and you might conclude that the difference in group size is probably attributable to differences in how much each type of ring was deforming the scope rather than the fact that one was aluminum, and the other steel.
 
Ya right, he probably believes in Santa also.....
Take 2 sets of rings from reputable makers out of either one of the materials lap em in and watch that test go to poop ...........
 
Thanks for the responses! I know most short range benchrest shooters use aluminum rings. Some of this may be due to the weight restrictions, but I figured if steel was better, somebody would find a way to shave weight elsewhere.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
167,431
Messages
2,232,638
Members
80,410
Latest member
GK.Price
Back
Top