Bit of basckground first: I've had a Sinclair runout gauge for 12 months now and clock and separate all my reloads by runaout. I'm loading 204, 260 and 7mm08 and using Redding S type sizing and competition seater.
I am generally getting around 20% 1 tho or less, 60% 1-4 tho and 20% 4-6 tho. Maybe 1 or 2 per 50 would be over 6 tho.
I've tried everything to reduce my runout, but have concluded I'm not going to remove it, so have recently bought one of the H & H runout gauges that allows you to "correct" the runout.
Well, first thing I did when it arrived was to clock some ammo I had already clocked with my Sinclair gauge....absolutly no correlation. 1 tho readings the Sinclair gave 3,4,5 on the HH gauge. 1 tho on the HH gave me 3,4,5 on the Sinclair.
I've been playing with them both now for a few weeks, and I've come to the conclusing that they are measuring totally different misalignments so I'm now wondering which is more realistic of whats happening in the chamber.
Here is my latest set of measurement on a batch I just loaded. First I measured the runout with the sinclair, then the HH, then adjusted it to <1tho in the HH, then re measured it in the sinclair again.
Sinclair-HH-Sinclair
1.5 1.5 0
5 1
5 1 4
4 1
3 1 3
2.5 1 2.5
3 2 3.5
3 0.5
4.5 0.5
3 1 4
0.5 1.5 1.5
3 0.5
1.5 2 3
0.5 2 2
3 1.5 4.5
4 2 5
2 0.5
2.5 1 2
2 0.5
2 0.5
4 1 3
3 1 4
2 1 2
2.5 1 2.5
4 1 4.5
2 2.5 2
2 0
2 2 3
3.5 2.5 5
1.5 1 3
3 1 2
1 1.5 3
5 0.5
1 2 1.5
1.5 0.5
3 1 1
1 1 0
5 1 7
2 1.5 2
2 1 2
1 1
4 2 3
Now typeing these numbere in I realise that there is nothing over 5,sincair). These cases have been turned, so maybe thats reduced overall runout.
Whats interesting is that often a low reading in the sinclair has a higher sinclair reading after adjustment in the HH gauge.
Havnt shot any ammo at paper yet to see if "straight" ammo as measured by either gauge actually shoots better.
Anyone else out their got the H & H gauge that they have compared to other gauges???
Cheers
Grant
I am generally getting around 20% 1 tho or less, 60% 1-4 tho and 20% 4-6 tho. Maybe 1 or 2 per 50 would be over 6 tho.
I've tried everything to reduce my runout, but have concluded I'm not going to remove it, so have recently bought one of the H & H runout gauges that allows you to "correct" the runout.
Well, first thing I did when it arrived was to clock some ammo I had already clocked with my Sinclair gauge....absolutly no correlation. 1 tho readings the Sinclair gave 3,4,5 on the HH gauge. 1 tho on the HH gave me 3,4,5 on the Sinclair.
I've been playing with them both now for a few weeks, and I've come to the conclusing that they are measuring totally different misalignments so I'm now wondering which is more realistic of whats happening in the chamber.
Here is my latest set of measurement on a batch I just loaded. First I measured the runout with the sinclair, then the HH, then adjusted it to <1tho in the HH, then re measured it in the sinclair again.
Sinclair-HH-Sinclair
1.5 1.5 0
5 1
5 1 4
4 1
3 1 3
2.5 1 2.5
3 2 3.5
3 0.5
4.5 0.5
3 1 4
0.5 1.5 1.5
3 0.5
1.5 2 3
0.5 2 2
3 1.5 4.5
4 2 5
2 0.5
2.5 1 2
2 0.5
2 0.5
4 1 3
3 1 4
2 1 2
2.5 1 2.5
4 1 4.5
2 2.5 2
2 0
2 2 3
3.5 2.5 5
1.5 1 3
3 1 2
1 1.5 3
5 0.5
1 2 1.5
1.5 0.5
3 1 1
1 1 0
5 1 7
2 1.5 2
2 1 2
1 1
4 2 3
Now typeing these numbere in I realise that there is nothing over 5,sincair). These cases have been turned, so maybe thats reduced overall runout.
Whats interesting is that often a low reading in the sinclair has a higher sinclair reading after adjustment in the HH gauge.
Havnt shot any ammo at paper yet to see if "straight" ammo as measured by either gauge actually shoots better.
Anyone else out their got the H & H gauge that they have compared to other gauges???
Cheers
Grant