Looking for some opinions. I have a Ruger M77 MKII .243 Win, (Zytel stock model), that needs a new barrel, or at least I think it does. The gun was purchased new in the mid-90s and I shot it a bit, but not much. Life went on and I now have the chance to really shoot and tinker more with my firearms, including this one.
Unfortunately... now that I've had a chance to really run it through it's paces I've concluded it shoots like a turd. I've tried just about every conceivable load and cannot get it to group under 2.5 MOA. While a relatively old gun, it hasn't been shot much so I know the barrel isn't shot out. I'm considering cutting my losses and trying a new barrel.
Ruger said they'd rebarrel it for $350-$400. I know barrel issues plagued some of the MKIIs up to about the time mine was manufactured. I own a few recent Rugers and they're all solid 1 MOA guns... which is all I'm trying to get out of this one.
So here's my question... if in my position, would you send it back to Ruger for a rebarrel job or to an aftermarket barrel manufacturer?
Unfortunately... now that I've had a chance to really run it through it's paces I've concluded it shoots like a turd. I've tried just about every conceivable load and cannot get it to group under 2.5 MOA. While a relatively old gun, it hasn't been shot much so I know the barrel isn't shot out. I'm considering cutting my losses and trying a new barrel.
Ruger said they'd rebarrel it for $350-$400. I know barrel issues plagued some of the MKIIs up to about the time mine was manufactured. I own a few recent Rugers and they're all solid 1 MOA guns... which is all I'm trying to get out of this one.
So here's my question... if in my position, would you send it back to Ruger for a rebarrel job or to an aftermarket barrel manufacturer?