With 90 grain VLD’s and COAL’s at 2.700+, the Redding 223 Competition Seating Die does not function as designed; that is, the sleeve does not fully encapsulate the cartridge case before the bullet begins its journey down the case neck during seating. For it to function at all, the die must be raised three turns, or more, from its desired position, and the micrometer knob unscrewed until it is practically floating. As an aside, the VLD seating stem exacerbates the problem, because its length is longer. All in all, a very, very unsatisfactory arrangement, but the die was never designed for bullets 1.250+ long.
Redding die bodies are in families: 223 Rem, 6 BR, and 6 PPC are all 2.750 long, while 260 Rem, 284 Win and 308 Win are 3.500. Simply swapping die bodies will not work without modifying the longer die body.
I have not measured the effect of this problem on TIR, but I am looking for a solution, because the micrometer knob does not maintain its position.
What I do not want to do is chamber a longer sleeve to put in the longer die body, but it is an option.
Wilson is my backup, but the seating stem is barely in the die body and my die does not have the micrometer top.
Does Forster suffer from the same malady as Redding? Or am I missing something?
Redding die bodies are in families: 223 Rem, 6 BR, and 6 PPC are all 2.750 long, while 260 Rem, 284 Win and 308 Win are 3.500. Simply swapping die bodies will not work without modifying the longer die body.
I have not measured the effect of this problem on TIR, but I am looking for a solution, because the micrometer knob does not maintain its position.
What I do not want to do is chamber a longer sleeve to put in the longer die body, but it is an option.
Wilson is my backup, but the seating stem is barely in the die body and my die does not have the micrometer top.
Does Forster suffer from the same malady as Redding? Or am I missing something?