Is there a ratio of loaded-round neck diameter to reamer neck diameter that optimal for accuracy, chamber sealing and brass longevity? If annealing makes a difference, I anneal after every firing.
For my straight .284 with a .316 diameter neck, brass turned down to .012 (.308 loaded round diameter - .008 clearance 97.5%) to .0135 (.311 loaded round diameter - .005 clearance 98.5%) seems to shoot equally well with approximately a .002 interference fit. I have not tried any other neck turned thicknesses.
Does the case neck begin the chamber sealing process or is the neck the last part of the brass to seal? Does that matter?
I have ordered a 7-6.5 PRC reamer with a .315 neck but thinking about changing to a .314 or .313. I am not sure why but it seems easier to consistently turn Lapua brass to .012. In a .313 chamber that would be 98.4%.
Is all of the above irrelevant?
Thanks,
Hank
For my straight .284 with a .316 diameter neck, brass turned down to .012 (.308 loaded round diameter - .008 clearance 97.5%) to .0135 (.311 loaded round diameter - .005 clearance 98.5%) seems to shoot equally well with approximately a .002 interference fit. I have not tried any other neck turned thicknesses.
Does the case neck begin the chamber sealing process or is the neck the last part of the brass to seal? Does that matter?
I have ordered a 7-6.5 PRC reamer with a .315 neck but thinking about changing to a .314 or .313. I am not sure why but it seems easier to consistently turn Lapua brass to .012. In a .313 chamber that would be 98.4%.
Is all of the above irrelevant?
Thanks,
Hank