It is only an approximation. Your components and barrel are different than what Quickload used to get data.QuickLoad simply provides you with the time that the bullet is in the barrel (barrel time)
It is only an approximation. Your components and barrel are different than what Quickload used to get data.
As Ned said, QuickLoad simply provides you with the time that the bullet is in the barrel (barrel time) and you can use that information to help tune the load so that the bullet leaves the muzzle around an OBT node.
What about the fact that the same load and rifle system won't produce the same muzzle velocity across several people shooting it?But since the software's approximation is repeatable we can use it as a marker to make adjustments from.
How can that be when several velocity changing parameters can not be input to the software?The 'math' that is QL will be as accurate or more so than other methods of developing a load.
QL doesn't work unless accurate velocities are inputted.
The 'math' that is QL will be as accurate or more so than other methods of developing a load.
It takes time and understanding to operate QL, it is not just a calculator, the user must have knowledge of internal ballistics.
Well then, things have changed from when I first used it.Every velocity affecting parameter can be changed in QL, including bullet diameter/weight, barrel groove diameter and cross-sectional bore area & barrel length, case weighting factor, starting pressure, capacity manual entry & adjusted for bullet area seated. Then there are the powder parameters, temperature and friction adjustments.
Zero, Have back-tested my best loads and found the barrel times to be in the range of 1-2% Longer Duration than Long’s original predictions FWIWI work up loads with QL and the OBT is usually not reliable, but half the time is close enough to give you an idea where to dig around. But otherwise I have to true the inputs for Shot Start pressure, Burn Rate Factor Ba, bullet length, case capacity.
One time the OBT predicted by QL was true (100% on the money), but that's because I knew the barrel well enough to know how to adjust the shot start pressure when in the lands (but not jammed). It ended up being the most accurate load I've ever shot in that barrel.
Zero, Have back-tested my best loads and found the barrel times to be in the range of 1-2% Longer Duration than Long’s original predictions FWIW
The inputs to QL all have an influence on velocity as does external temperatures.How can that be when several velocity changing parameters can not be input to the software?