jesilva said:
What makes one stock shape more desirable than another (example; benchrest/F-Open with flat forend). What makes a commercially made stock better performing than say carving or reshaping your own piece of wood. Do commercial stocks have better ergonomics in general? Are commercial designs developed through experimentation or just more pleasing to look at? I like to modify existing laminate stocks into benchrest styles and have also whittled one from an uninletted blank. Am I shooting myself in the foot by trying to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear?
Thanks for any responses
Jim
Jim...commercial stock makers and dedicated stock makers cannot always deliver the right stock for your body conformation. If you can roll your own, so to say, great.
As I was transitioning from service rifle NRA HP to bolt action NRA HP back in the early 1990's, I could not locate a bolt action stock that fit me for the four positions of NRA HP. I proceeded to tailor make my own from some black walnut wood that an older gentleman had given to me. Attached are photos of two similar but not identical,
non-orthodox for the times HP rifle stocks that I fashioned to fit my body conformation.
The lower stock is set for the
off hand position for my LOP. The top is set for the
sitting position with an extended LOP and hand stop set to keep my gloved hand on the front of the perch belly. For the
prone rapid fire, LOP was extended a set amount--hand stop extended a hand width. For
prone slow fire
the LOP was extended a set amount--hand stop extended to end of fore arm.
You seem to be more interested in bench rest/F-Class stocks. I would like to say that each of these two over-the-course designs can be easily modified again to make
un-orthodox, yet very competitive F-Class Open stocks by a simple change to the rear stock area and the addition of a 3-inch wooden forearm attachment.
This is not an offer to sell you anything, but to further inpire you to take care of yourself when the stock makers won't!!
Dan