• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Primer depth for accuracy

I'm trying to find anyone's actual testing experience regarding primer seating depth. With the Accuracy One primer seating gauge and the Primal rights seating tool, among others, it is possible to mostly control or at least ascertain what each rounds seating depth is. But.....does it really make any difference in accuracy. Does .001 more or less crush translate to more accurate loads? Does it affect ES or SD? Is it quantifiable? Thx.
 
You'd need to uniform primer pockets, which is no biggie, then sort your primers by height, which kinda is, then keep them sorted as you prime brass looking for the same amount of crush fit using something like a K&M seater with depth gauge.

For a procedure that's not proven to be helpful, that's an obnoxious amount of time, work, and organization. At the level of 99.99% of shooters, myself definitely included, seat by feel.
 
I never understood all the hoopla about primer depth. If the primer pocket is unified and the primer is set against the bottom of the pocket, it would seem that they are all seated the same.

The primer is designed to go bang and transfer all its energy into the little hole in the case. How can a few thousandths make any difference. As stated above, most everyone seats them as deep as they will go.
 
I never understood all the hoopla about primer depth. If the primer pocket is unified and the primer is set against the bottom of the pocket, it would seem that they are all seated the same.

The primer is designed to go bang and transfer all its energy into the little hole in the case. How can a few thousandths make any difference. As stated above, most everyone seats them as deep as they will go.
Not disagreeing or being argumentative, but in that same line of thinking then why does a few thousandths of firing pin fall matter? But it's accepted that it does.
 
Not disagreeing or being argumentative, but in that same line of thinking then why does a few thousandths of firing pin fall matter? But it's accepted that it does.

"A few thousands " is not the same criticality everywhere in the entire systems of both gun and ammunition universally. For instance, some guns like a lot of bullet jump to lands. Some like 2b jammed into the lands.

The fact that a few thousands of firing pin fall can be significant has no direct connection or indication of causality that a few thousands of primer seating depth matters.
 
Bart did some testing years ago?
 
Yes - but .001 increments no. You will find a range though like bullet seating. Good thread from a few months back. Uniformity of primer pockets is worth mentioning as a starting point.
Bart Sauter reported that he did some testing. I believe that it was probably done at his home basement slot range, using a rail and he said that his results showed that as long as primers were bottomed that they shot well, I do not believed that he found any problems with compressing them some. The recent post that I remember about primer seating depths involved a small sample shot at long range under less than perfect conditions.

IMO most shooters do not have a set of flags, have their rest situation optimized, and may not have the use of a top level bench. Almost none take advantage of the obvious advantages of tuning at the range, but lacking much of this, they obsess on minutia that will get lost in conditions, if it has any real effect at all. Fix the obvious stuff first. Under the best conditions people shoot hundred yard aggregates under .200" with primers seated by feel.
 
Last edited:
Bart Sauter reported that he did some testing. I believe that it was probably done at his home basement slot range, using a rail and he said that his results showed that as long as primers were bottomed that they shot well, I do not believed that he found any problems with compressing them some. The recent post that I remember about primer seating depths involved a small sample shot at long range under less than perfect conditions.

IMO most shooters do not have a set of flags, have their rest situation optimized, and may not have the use of a top level bench. Almost none take advantage of the obvious advantages of tuning at the range, but lacking much of this, they obsess on minutia that will get lost in conditions, if it has any real effect at all. Fix the obvious stuff first. Under the best conditions people shoot hundred yard aggregates under .200" with primers seated by feel.
Or in other words, as oft said, it don’t matter if you can’t shoot the difference.
 
Bart Sauter reported that he did some testing. I believe that it was probably done at his home basement slot range, using a rail and he said that his results showed that as long as primers were bottomed that they shot well, I do not believed that he found any problems with compressing them some. The recent post that I remember about primer seating depths involved a small sample shot at long range under less than perfect conditions.

IMO most shooters do not have a set of flags, have their rest situation optimized, and may not have the use of a top level bench. Almost none take advantage of the obvious advantages of tuning at the range, but lacking much of this, they obsess on minutia that will get lost in conditions, if it has any real effect at all. Fix the obvious stuff first. Under the best conditions people shoot hundred yard aggregates under .200" with primers seated by feel.

I agree - most SR benchrest shooters reloading skillsets are honed through a lot of practice and technique. I'd surmise most competitive SR shooters primer seating "feel" is very consistent in the same way as their powder throwing technique is. Take an average joe and that same powder thrower is probably a lot more inconsistent.

I should also say always read these posts as if they are being asked in relation benchrest shooting of some sort since they are dealing with some nitty gritty aspect of reloading, but your point is well taken that it may not matter if they don't start with the foundations of accuracy.
 
Last edited:
Primers are a primitive explosive device. They have to be seated to a depth that seats the anvil against the priming compound in such a way to sensitize them to respond to the firing pin strike setting off the explosion. I have had some Wolf LR primers that where I would get hang fires, click-bang, unless absolutely crushed. I err on the side of more pressure is better when seating primers. I seat mine to the bottom. Give the case a half a turn and hit it again. Just my routine.
 
Primers are a primitive explosive device. They have to be seated to a depth that seats the anvil against the priming compound in such a way to sensitize them to respond to the firing pin strike setting off the explosion. I have had some Wolf LR primers that where I would get hang fires, click-bang, unless absolutely crushed. I err on the side of more pressure is better when seating primers. I seat mine to the bottom. Give the case a half a turn and hit it again. Just my routine.
I agree it is a good thing to seat that primer as deep as it will go. Leaving it .002 or .003 thousandths off the floor of the primer pocket just makes no sense to me.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,471
Messages
2,196,652
Members
78,936
Latest member
Mitch.Holmes
Back
Top