Lucky Shooter
Gold $$ Contributor
We've had a few comments about partial neck sizing----supposedly for the rear part of the neck
to help with bullet alignment/concentricity----and the front part of the neck to grip the bullet and
provide neck clearance.
I've heard many times that the bullet gripping surface should have a minimum length equal to
the bullet shank dimeter----a "they say" for many years.
The 222 neck easily provides for this amount of bullet gripping surface but the entire neck length
of the 223 is less than .224".
I don't have any hard data on this but think this might have improved group size for the 222 and 22PPC, both with generous neck lengths.
Anyone have any experience in using these techniques ?
Thanks for any opinions.
A. Weldy
to help with bullet alignment/concentricity----and the front part of the neck to grip the bullet and
provide neck clearance.
I've heard many times that the bullet gripping surface should have a minimum length equal to
the bullet shank dimeter----a "they say" for many years.
The 222 neck easily provides for this amount of bullet gripping surface but the entire neck length
of the 223 is less than .224".
I don't have any hard data on this but think this might have improved group size for the 222 and 22PPC, both with generous neck lengths.
Anyone have any experience in using these techniques ?
Thanks for any opinions.
A. Weldy