I've read this before, and I must confess I don't get it. As I understand neck-turning, it's done to make sure that the neck tension is identical from one round to the next, and at all positions around the bullet seated in the case. Unless you have a chamber so tight that neck-resizing is unnecessary after firing a round, you will size the neck down via some accurate tool like the Wilson chamber-type neck sizer (that, I believe, resizes only the last 3/16" of the neck) prior to reloading. The only disadvantage I can see for a larger chamber is that you end up working the brass in the neck more than is ideal. What am I missing here? I'm asking because I'm going to be loading for a .222 Rem. with a standard (not BR) chamber.
I understand the potential injury angle, guys; thanks a lot for your thoughts. I too am a "mature" gentleman and hadn't considered this possibility.
When we talk about a tight-neck chamber, it usually infers a barrel was chambered by a gunsmith with a custom reamer that also has other design characteristics (i.e throat angle, free-bore, base diameter, case length) that are conducive to getting that last bit of accuracy out of the cartridge...many times designed around a specific brand of brass such as Lapua. Compare this to a factory chambering which has a wide acceptable tolerance range and due to mass production reasons most likely have a non-concentric throat and other accuracy killing manufacturing defects (too numerous to list) the sad fact is your accuracy is limited by how well your chamber was executed by the factory and how well it interfaces with the specific brand of brass and type of bullets you use.In other words, with a factory chamber you'll most likely never reap the benefits of consistent bullet release due to other accuracy robbing defects.