• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Neck Bushings- Bullet Central vs SAC

foxguy

Gold $$ Contributor
So I recently discovered that the SAC Neck Sizing Bushings typically over size .001 thousand's. Ie, the .242 bushing sizes the neck to .243. I also checked the .261 neck sizing bushing and the neck measured .262.

Does Bullet Centrals Neck Sizing Bushings size to the stated bushing Size?
 
The actual size of the neck after sizing will generally be larger than the size of the bushing due to springback of the brass regardless of the bushing used. Now if you want to talk about consistency and or tolerance of the bushings actual size, that's different question.
 
So I recently discovered that the SAC Neck Sizing Bushings typically over size .001 thousand's. Ie, the .242 bushing sizes the neck to .243. I also checked the .261 neck sizing bushing and the neck measured .262.

Does Bullet Centrals Neck Sizing Bushings size to the stated bushing Size?
Ima say thats spring back. My sac and Wilson bushings do the same
 
Thanks everyone. Getting to be one of the old guys, and I guess my memory is showing.
 
Last edited:
The two BC Micron bushings I have used thus far - 0.332 and 0.333 - both over-size the necks by 3 thou. ie the necks come out @ 0.329 and 0.330, respectively. And that's with necks that have been turned (0.013") and annealed on an AMP with the Aztec code.

Not what I was looking for, not even close.
 
The two BC Micron bushings I have used thus far - 0.332 and 0.333 - both over-size the necks by 3 thou. ie the necks come out @ 0.329 and 0.330, respectively. And that's with necks that have been turned (0.013") and annealed on an AMP with the Aztec code.

Not what I was looking for, not even close.
WOW, that sounds a little excessive.
 
The two BC Micron bushings I have used thus far - 0.332 and 0.333 - both over-size the necks by 3 thou. ie the necks come out @ 0.329 and 0.330, respectively. And that's with necks that have been turned (0.013") and annealed on an AMP with the Aztec code.

Not what I was looking for, not even close.
Did you try to measure the ID of the bushing?
 
The part that melts my brain is that my *Wilson* bushings, same marked - and measured - sizes, size the necks much closer to the advertised size. Right on, to maybe 1 thou under.

Why the difference? NFC.
 
Last edited:
The two BC Micron bushings I have used thus far - 0.332 and 0.333 - both over-size the necks by 3 thou. ie the necks come out @ 0.329 and 0.330, respectively. And that's with necks that have been turned (0.013") and annealed on an AMP with the Aztec code.

Not what I was looking for, not even close.
I've never seen anything this far off
 
The two BC Micron bushings I have used thus far - 0.332 and 0.333 - both over-size the necks by 3 thou. ie the necks come out @ 0.329 and 0.330, respectively. And that's with necks that have been turned (0.013") and annealed on an AMP with the Aztec code.

Not what I was looking for, not even close.
Marty
There is a lot of variables that influence results when forming alloy materials. Too many to write out here. I've learned a few things over a long, long time of hands on tool making. Give me a call and we can spend an hour or two on the phone.
Alan
 
The part that melts my brain is that my *Wilson* bushings, same marked - and measured - sizes, size the necks much closer to the advertised size. Right on, to maybe 1 thou under.

Why the difference? NFC.
Does one brand size the neck further down towards the shoulder? Do any of them size the neck to where there is taper?

Try flipping the SAC bushing over? I haven't seen a SAC bushing, so if this isn't possible, then disregard.
 
You can't measure bushings by how they size brass as stated above, if you really wanna know what they are use guage pins
Caution that gauge pins only measure the smallest diameter. They can not detect ovality. As an extreme example, a .2500 pin would pass thru a 0.2501 square hole.
 
Caution that gauge pins only measure the smallest diameter. They can not detect ovality. As an extreme example, a .2500 pin would pass thru a 0.2501 square hole.
I'm more worried about a bushing being .223 and not a .226 it was stamped that I discovered with guage pins.
Not sure a .0001 will make a difference on target in a bushing or you can measure that accurately on bushings.
My guess is theres more to worry about in your loading processes than a bushing being .0001 out.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,327
Messages
2,216,638
Members
79,554
Latest member
GerSteve
Back
Top