• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

N560 and N565 in 6.5 PRC

I shot both Hornady and once fired Federal brass at today's range session . Hornady load was 57.2 grs of H560 behind 139gr Lupua average velocity 3183 FPS SD 12' . Just under 1/2 100 yd groups ,zero pressure signs,bolt opened smooth as silk . Federal brass is 15grs heavier that Hornady 57,2 grs of V-V N565 behind 139gr Lupua produced average velocity 3,.139 SD of 9.9 and 5/8ths 5 shot group severe Bolt lift . Shinny ejector on a couple pieces. Why with a slower powder did I have less velocity out of 28" bbl. Same seating depth .
 
As long as everything else is the same (case, bullet, charge weight, etc.) , a slower burning powder should yield a slower muzzle velocity. The slower powders can be capable of higher velocities but require increases in charge weights. Since you changed brass and the case volumes are different, it isn't apples-to-apples though.

I don't have a burn rate chart handy that lists N565, but looking at the burn rates in Quickload (Ba) N560 appears faster than N565. That is assuming their burn rates listed are accurate.
 
All else being equal... What's different?

- Heavier case, thicker wall.
* Thicker wall: higher neck tension?
- 15 gr heavier case has 1.8 gr smaller H2O case volume.
* Smaller case volume: higher pressure.
* Pressed charge with smaller case volume? Check seating depth.

One would think higher pressure leads to higher MV.
It's quite the puzzle.
 
I thought cause of higher pressure,I'd get higher velocity . Yes its a puzzle. Powder charges will be decreased in Federal brass.
 
I thought cause of higher pressure,I'd get higher velocity .

You're confusing peak and total pressure, ie the area under the pressure / time curve. Use a smaller capacity case with same powder / charge weight / bullet / primer etc and you increase peak pressure. A larger capacity case will then normally give rather lower peak pressure, but the option of increasing the charge weight to input a greater amount of energy and obtain higher MVs at same peak pressures.

That's with one powder, but you've changed two variables in one set of tests - case make and probably capacity; and powder grade / burning rate. Normally, you'd expect lower pressures and MVs from the slower burning powder, but other factors can change outcomes. That's why we research loads data, then do careful work-up load development in our own rifles, each of which behaves as an individual.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
164,864
Messages
2,185,375
Members
78,541
Latest member
LBanister
Back
Top