lpreddick said:
i'm on my THIRD chrony now...shot the other two by accident. i kept gettig strange mvs , so i kept shooting lower to the sensors not realizing my scope was 2+in above bullet path. i strung an aiming j point 3 in above the sensors and usually get "real"mvs but still get ones that are not possible. currently i'm connectng a battery several hours before going to the range, then changing to a new one then. i like the idea of having a load that measures true and maybe using it as a test load before and during load development.
I've found that lighting is a major issue with most chronographs that rely on ambient lighting.
Since I live in a area where "sunshine" is often just a word in the Dictionary or mentioned in a weather forecast for a distant city, I invested in a Chronograph that utilized the InfraRed Sensors.
I can use my chronograph on any day I choose as long as it's not raining and get nice reliable readings no matter what the ambient light situation is. Others who come to the range to chronograph their loads often sputter and cuss because they either get NO readings or the readings they do get are in the "you've got to be kidding" category. One shooter has gone through three chronographs, all different brands, in the last year. Even something as simple as a couple of LED strips from an auto parts store, taped to the top of his sky screens, and powered with a couple of lantern batteries would have cured his problem but he thought it would look too "Mickey Mouse".
Unless you have I/R sensors then you'll need to deal with lighting issues. Not just light, but steady light.