25AI260 said:
i wondering after a little experimenting this past weekend whether If its worth turning necks 'Does It Really Matter'..? it looks scary.. the neck is so thin looking thinking [.010-11] they'll split down the road at some point i made up all turned, ten live rounds rounds five ready cases an two dummies 110gr & 125 to the oal of 2.320/2.375 if they're to long its not much of a problem they went so easy i guess with little force the bullet can be move in the chamber .. i couldn't by hand
i did expend the 6br case with a tapper button in the Reading FL die in one pass it went really easy with a lot of lube an didn't get much of a bump back at the shoulder i've read about.. overall not bad But i'm now re-thinking the size of the chamber. 1 - the case on an average come out 1.528-29 +/-, But after doing a computer test [powely comp program] i found the shorter case [1.500] gets a small amount more velocity at the same cartridge oal length - less bullet in the neck which isn't much to start with
2- i'm not sure what i want to do about turning necks cause the necks also have come out at .328-29..
wasn't able to get a hold of my smitty this week so i have to wait till fri to call... watts u're input... i'm i over thinking ?
Edit:...
also i left out a thought on turning necks... after re-forming the 6br case in the die the necks probably aren't perfectly true so the wall thickness wouldn't [i 'm think] be even around the circumference .. will that matter down the road ?
To start with your first question: Should I even turn necks?
Above you mentioned that you will be running a standard 1.500 .330 neck chamber, You have no choice you
must turn necks.
The reason being is the thinnest i've ever seen the Lapua brass necks is .0125" x 2= .025 so add that to bullet Dia at the Pressure ring and you get (for the two bullets you mentioned .3085 at the PR and .3080 at the Shank) .3335 with the Bergers and .3337 with RG's Bib's (.3087 PR and .3084 Shank), So I (who have never won a match of any kind so take it for what its worth) would turn the Necks to NO MORE than .328 and .327 over bullet might be better .
Thats turning to .0095(X 2) = .327 over bullet with Bergers and .3277 over bullet with BiB's giving you a neck to chamber clearance of .0023 / 2 = .00115. (More on bullets later)
Next question: Won't the Necks Split?
No, simple answer, I've got about 90rds per case on my current lot of 30br's zero failures.
You mentioned two bullets 110's and 125's now something to keep in mind is a 110 is made on a .975 jacket which gives you a bearing surface length of about .320" and the 125 is made on the 1" Jacket which gives you a bearing surface length of about .370" (.050" difference).
I shoot a 118-7 Bib which is built on a 1" Jacket (This is where the similarities end between Berger and BIB) and gives me a bearing surface length of about .415" , I like that extra length cause it allows for more versatile placement in the case, and they sure seem like there easier (for me anyway) to tune. The difference in Shank dia may help that as well with BIB's being a .3084 along the bearing surface.
To Summarize , Pick one Jacket length bullet, (preferably pic a bullet weight) and have your chamber cut to that, also having that decision out of the way helps you figure out what you want to do for neck thickness, now I know where talking tenths of thousands here but my statements are geared to the PRECISION shooter that expects to extract the most performance out of his/her rig.
For what its worth.